PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UET5.DE vs. CSY2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UET5.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Euro Stoxx 50 ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) Dist (UET5.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UET5.DE achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly lower than CSY2.DE's 11.44% return.


UET5.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
-1.28%
6M
8.70%
YTD
10.71%
1Y
22.64%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.76%

CSY2.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
0.44%
6M
10.76%
YTD
11.44%
1Y
22.74%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UET5.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UET5.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Euro Stoxx 50 ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) Dist
10.71%25.93%12.78%25.33%-9.34%26.97%42.52%
CSY2.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD
11.44%6.30%30.42%25.14%-16.59%44.53%12.20%

Correlation

The correlation between UET5.DE and CSY2.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2020

0.62

The correlation between UET5.DE and CSY2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UET5.DE vs. CSY2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UET5.DE
UET5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
UET5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UET5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
UET5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
UET5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
UET5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CSY2.DE
CSY2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CSY2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSY2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UET5.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Euro Stoxx 50 ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) Dist (UET5.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UET5.DECSY2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

2.48

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

8.68

-1.88

UET5.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UET5.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the CSY2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UET5.DE and CSY2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UET5.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UET5.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, which is greater than CSY2.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UET5.DE and CSY2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UET5.DECSY2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.03%

-24.56%

-12.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-9.14%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-24.56%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.09%

-24.56%

+1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-1.17%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-4.72%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.61%

+0.71%

Volatility

UET5.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Euro Stoxx 50 ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) Dist (UET5.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) at 3.30%. This indicates that UET5.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSY2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UET5.DECSY2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

3.30%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.20%

8.77%

+5.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.94%

12.58%

+4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

16.24%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.62%

18.42%

+1.20%

UET5.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UET5.DE and CSY2.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UET5.DE vs. CSY2.DE - Dividend Comparison

UET5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, while CSY2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CSY2.DE
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UET5.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Euro Stoxx 50 ESG UCITS ETF (EUR) Dist
2.87%2.15%3.28%2.96%3.06%1.90%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


UET5.DE and CSY2.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UET5.DE and CSY2.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

UET5.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while CSY2.DE is Large Cap Blend Equities. UET5.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50 ESG, while CSY2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Credit Suisse.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UET5.DE and CSY2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer