UEQU.DE vs. XAAG.DE
UEQU.DE (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and XAAG.DE (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc) are both Commodities funds - UEQU.DE tracks the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped while XAAG.DE tracks the Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture and Livestock. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UEQU.DE returned 14.40%/yr vs 14.95%/yr for XAAG.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UEQU.DE charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XAAG.DE.
Performance
UEQU.DE vs. XAAG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UEQU.DE achieves a 25.53% return, which is significantly lower than XAAG.DE's 27.69% return.
UEQU.DE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 25.53%
- 6M
- 26.95%
- 1Y
- 40.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 14.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
XAAG.DE
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 27.69%
- 6M
- 27.75%
- 1Y
- 46.69%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 14.95%
- 10Y*
- —
UEQU.DE vs. XAAG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UEQU.DE UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 25.53% | 6.36% | 13.03% | -8.33% | 20.34% | 46.31% | -10.57% | 14.71% | -7.23% | 10.29% |
XAAG.DE Invesco Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc | 27.69% | 12.13% | 14.84% | -14.76% | 23.35% | 39.76% | -19.46% | 12.99% | -5.11% | 4.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between UEQU.DE and XAAG.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between UEQU.DE and XAAG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UEQU.DE vs. XAAG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UEQU.DE
XAAG.DE
UEQU.DE vs. XAAG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (XAAG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UEQU.DE | XAAG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.39 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.29 | 4.08 | +2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.25 | 9.65 | +5.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UEQU.DE | XAAG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.17 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.73 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.49 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
UEQU.DE vs. XAAG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UEQU.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.56%, smaller than the maximum XAAG.DE drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEQU.DE and XAAG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UEQU.DE | XAAG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.56% | -33.85% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | -11.54% | +5.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.66% | -16.26% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.44% | -33.85% | +11.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -2.54% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.92% | -13.88% | +4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 4.89% | -2.20% |
Volatility
UEQU.DE vs. XAAG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) is 3.91%, while Invesco Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (XAAG.DE) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that UEQU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAAG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UEQU.DE | XAAG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 4.71% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 18.81% | -5.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 21.76% | -6.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 20.32% | -3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 18.40% | -1.99% |
UEQU.DE vs. XAAG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UEQU.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than XAAG.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
UEQU.DE vs. XAAG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither UEQU.DE nor XAAG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, UEQU.DE and XAAG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XAAG.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XAAG.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UEQU.DE.
UEQU.DE tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped, while XAAG.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture and Livestock. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UEQU.DE and 0.19% for XAAG.DE.
Find the right allocation for UEQU.DE and XAAG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer