UEQU.DE vs. AW1P.DE
UEQU.DE (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and AW1P.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI ACWI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UEQU.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped, while AW1P.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UEQU.DE returned 14.81%/yr vs 17.31%/yr for AW1P.DE. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UEQU.DE charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AW1P.DE.
Performance
UEQU.DE vs. AW1P.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UEQU.DE achieves a 25.53% return, which is significantly higher than AW1P.DE's 14.91% return.
UEQU.DE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 25.53%
- 6M
- 26.95%
- 1Y
- 40.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 14.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
AW1P.DE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 14.91%
- 6M
- 14.81%
- 1Y
- 26.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UEQU.DE vs. AW1P.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UEQU.DE UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 25.53% | 6.36% | 13.03% | -8.33% | 3.01% |
AW1P.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI ACWI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 14.91% | 3.61% | 25.39% | 22.76% | -14.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between UEQU.DE and AW1P.DE is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.17 |
The correlation between UEQU.DE and AW1P.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UEQU.DE vs. AW1P.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UEQU.DE
AW1P.DE
UEQU.DE vs. AW1P.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI ACWI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (AW1P.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UEQU.DE | AW1P.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.33 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.29 | 3.17 | +3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.25 | 11.65 | +3.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UEQU.DE | AW1P.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 1.85 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.69 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
UEQU.DE vs. AW1P.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UEQU.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.56%, which is greater than AW1P.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEQU.DE and AW1P.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UEQU.DE | AW1P.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.56% | -23.64% | -6.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | -8.07% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.66% | -23.64% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -0.83% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.92% | -5.35% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.20% | +0.49% |
Volatility
UEQU.DE vs. AW1P.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) is 3.91%, while UBS ETF (IE) MSCI ACWI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (AW1P.DE) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that UEQU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AW1P.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UEQU.DE | AW1P.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 4.21% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 10.23% | +2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 13.86% | +1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 15.73% | +1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 15.73% | +0.68% |
UEQU.DE vs. AW1P.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UEQU.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than AW1P.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
UEQU.DE vs. AW1P.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither UEQU.DE nor AW1P.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UEQU.DE and AW1P.DE have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AW1P.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AW1P.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UEQU.DE.
UEQU.DE is categorized as Commodities, while AW1P.DE is Global Equities. UEQU.DE tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped, while AW1P.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UEQU.DE and 0.25% for AW1P.DE.
Find the right allocation for UEQU.DE and AW1P.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer