UEQU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UEQU.DE (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and 4UBQ.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UEQU.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped, while 4UBQ.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UEQU.DE returned 14.40%/yr vs 15.51%/yr for 4UBQ.DE. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UEQU.DE charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for 4UBQ.DE.

Performance

UEQU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEQU.DE achieves a 25.53% return, which is significantly higher than 4UBQ.DE's 11.15% return.

UEQU.DE

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 2.99%
• YTD: 25.53%
• 6M: 26.95%
• 1Y: 40.51%
• 3Y*: 14.81%
• 5Y*: 14.40%
• 10Y*: 10.80%

4UBQ.DE

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 4.20%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 28.46%
• 3Y*: 18.50%
• 5Y*: 15.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEQU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
UEQU.DE UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	25.53%	6.36%	13.03%	-8.33%	20.34%	46.31%	5.06%
4UBQ.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc	11.15%	5.39%	31.02%	24.03%	-13.92%	43.62%	8.66%

Correlation

The correlation between UEQU.DE and 4UBQ.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2020	0.22

The correlation between UEQU.DE and 4UBQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UEQU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEQU.DE

UEQU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 82
UEQU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
UEQU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
UEQU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 79
UEQU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
UEQU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 79

4UBQ.DE

4UBQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 79
4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
4UBQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
4UBQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 78
4UBQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
4UBQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEQU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UEQU.DE	4UBQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	2.47	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	3.36	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.46	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.29	4.10	+2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.25	15.73	-0.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UEQU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEQU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the 4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEQU.DE and 4UBQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UEQU.DE	4UBQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	2.47	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	1.00	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	1.11	-0.46

Drawdowns

UEQU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEQU.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.56%, which is greater than 4UBQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEQU.DE and 4UBQ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	UEQU.DE	4UBQ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.56%	-23.35%	-7.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.50%	-6.93%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.66%	-23.35%	+7.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.44%	-23.35%	+0.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.21%	0.00%	-1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.92%	-4.02%	-4.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.69%	1.81%	+0.88%

Volatility

UEQU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UEQU.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) at 2.81%. This indicates that UEQU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4UBQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UEQU.DE	4UBQ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.91%	2.81%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.03%	7.61%	+5.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.73%	11.53%	+4.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.83%	15.27%	+1.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.41%	15.39%	+1.02%

UEQU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEQU.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

UEQU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither UEQU.DE nor 4UBQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UEQU.DE and 4UBQ.DE in my portfolio?

UEQU.DE and 4UBQ.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UEQU.DE or 4UBQ.DE?

On fees, 4UBQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UEQU.DE or 4UBQ.DE?

4UBQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UEQU.DE.

What is the main difference between UEQU.DE and 4UBQ.DE?

UEQU.DE is categorized as Commodities, while 4UBQ.DE is S&P 500. UEQU.DE tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped, while 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UEQU.DE and 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.