UEFS.DE vs. 36B1.DE
UEFS.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist) and 36B1.DE (iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - UEFS.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped while 36B1.DE tracks the JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UEFS.DE returned 3.30%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for 36B1.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UEFS.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for 36B1.DE.
Performance
UEFS.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UEFS.DE achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly higher than 36B1.DE's 2.43% return.
UEFS.DE
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- 1Y
- 11.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 3.55%
36B1.DE
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.20%
- 10Y*
- —
UEFS.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UEFS.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist | 3.71% | 2.37% | 13.84% | 8.28% | -14.67% | 5.66% | -4.70% | 9.42% |
36B1.DE iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF | 2.43% | -0.10% | 10.86% | 5.55% | -13.71% | 6.46% | -4.35% | 11.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between UEFS.DE and 36B1.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between UEFS.DE and 36B1.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UEFS.DE vs. 36B1.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UEFS.DE
36B1.DE
UEFS.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UEFS.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UEFS.DE | 36B1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.25 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 2.63 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.59 | 6.72 | +5.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UEFS.DE | 36B1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.32 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.26 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.23 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
UEFS.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UEFS.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.26%, which is greater than 36B1.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEFS.DE and 36B1.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UEFS.DE | 36B1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.26% | -22.46% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -2.95% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.70% | -12.43% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.84% | -16.34% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -1.33% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.41% | -8.64% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 1.16% | -0.25% |
Volatility
UEFS.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UEFS.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) have volatilities of 1.27% and 1.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UEFS.DE | 36B1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 1.21% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.77% | 3.81% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.76% | 5.87% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.69% | 8.41% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.37% | 9.55% | -0.18% |
UEFS.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UEFS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than 36B1.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
UEFS.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Dividend Comparison
UEFS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, more than 36B1.DE's 4.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36B1.DE iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF | 4.93% | 5.22% | 4.96% | 5.09% | 5.00% | 4.57% | 3.40% | 4.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UEFS.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist | 6.50% | 7.96% | 6.14% | 6.46% | 6.08% | 4.22% | 5.09% | 4.60% | 4.53% | 4.90% | 2.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, UEFS.DE and 36B1.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, UEFS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UEFS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for 36B1.DE.
UEFS.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped, while 36B1.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UEFS.DE and 0.45% for 36B1.DE.
Find the right allocation for UEFS.DE and 36B1.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer