PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEEH.DE vs. JPGL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEEH.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD Dist (UEEH.DE) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPGL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEEH.DE achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly lower than JPGL.DE's 14.83% return.


UEEH.DE

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.93%
6M
3.49%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*

JPGL.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
3.41%
YTD
14.83%
6M
15.51%
1Y
25.01%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEEH.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UEEH.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD Dist
2.93%-1.30%17.87%3.61%-4.41%24.47%0.95%
JPGL.DE
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
14.83%5.19%16.53%9.72%-4.98%33.81%8.09%

Correlation

The correlation between UEEH.DE and JPGL.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2020

0.78

The correlation between UEEH.DE and JPGL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEEH.DE vs. JPGL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEEH.DE
UEEH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UEEH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEEH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEEH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UEEH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEEH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

JPGL.DE
JPGL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
JPGL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPGL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEEH.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD Dist (UEEH.DE) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPGL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UEEH.DEJPGL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.52

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

5.23

-4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.94

20.51

-18.57

UEEH.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEEH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the JPGL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEEH.DE and JPGL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UEEH.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEEH.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, smaller than the maximum JPGL.DE drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEEH.DE and JPGL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEEH.DEJPGL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-35.54%

+22.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.33%

-4.76%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.87%

-17.34%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.87%

-17.34%

+4.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.36%

0.00%

-5.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-4.76%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

1.22%

+0.89%

Volatility

UEEH.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD Dist (UEEH.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.16% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPGL.DE) at 2.00%. This indicates that UEEH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPGL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEEH.DEJPGL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.16%

2.00%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.75%

6.09%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.12%

8.63%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.30%

11.86%

-1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.22%

14.94%

-4.72%

UEEH.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEEH.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than JPGL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

UEEH.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Dividend Comparison

UEEH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while JPGL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
JPGL.DE
JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEEH.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.68%1.72%1.70%1.89%1.73%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


UEEH.DE and JPGL.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPGL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPGL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for UEEH.DE.

UEEH.DE tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility, while JPGL.DE tracks JP Morgan Diversified Factor Global Developed (Region Aware) Equity. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UEEH.DE and 0.20% for JPGL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEEH.DE and JPGL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer