PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEEG.DE vs. PR1S.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UEEG.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (UEEG.DE) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1S.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEEG.DE achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than PR1S.DE's 2.75% return.


UEEG.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
-0.63%
YTD
-0.84%
1Y
1.29%
3Y*
2.07%
5Y*
-0.99%
10Y*

PR1S.DE

1D
0.30%
1M
1.11%
6M
1.42%
YTD
2.75%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
2.25%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEEG.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UEEG.DE
iShares $ Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-0.84%4.64%0.67%2.27%-9.47%-2.61%-0.20%
PR1S.DE
Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)
2.75%-5.53%6.59%0.45%-6.78%5.92%-3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between UEEG.DE and PR1S.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2020

0.24

The correlation between UEEG.DE and PR1S.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEEG.DE vs. PR1S.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEEG.DE
UEEG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UEEG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEEG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEEG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UEEG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEEG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1S.DE
PR1S.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PR1S.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1S.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1S.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1S.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1S.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEEG.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (UEEG.DE) and Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1S.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UEEG.DEPR1S.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.16

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

1.18

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.28

3.05

-1.77

UEEG.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEEG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the PR1S.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEEG.DE and PR1S.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UEEG.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEEG.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.77%, smaller than the maximum PR1S.DE drawdown of -17.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEEG.DE and PR1S.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UEEG.DEPR1S.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.77%

-17.17%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.30%

-4.00%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.22%

-11.05%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.90%

-12.87%

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.19%

-11.07%

+4.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.23%

-10.38%

+3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.55%

-0.54%

Volatility

UEEG.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (UEEG.DE) is 1.00%, while Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1S.DE) has a volatility of 1.31%. This indicates that UEEG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PR1S.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UEEG.DEPR1S.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

1.31%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

3.76%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62%

5.46%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.30%

7.97%

-3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.03%

8.75%

-4.72%

UEEG.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UEEG.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1S.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UEEG.DE vs. PR1S.DE - Dividend Comparison

UEEG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PR1S.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PR1S.DE
Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)
3.13%3.22%2.83%2.36%1.91%1.73%2.14%1.50%
UEEG.DE
iShares $ Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UEEG.DE and PR1S.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PR1S.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1S.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UEEG.DE.

UEEG.DE tracks FTSE World Broad Investment-Grade USD Multilateral Development Bank Bond Capped Index (EUR Hedged), while PR1S.DE tracks Solactive US Treasury Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UEEG.DE and 0.05% for PR1S.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEEG.DE and PR1S.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer