PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDVD.L vs. USFM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDVD.L vs. USFM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UDVD.L is traded in USD, while USFM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the USFM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDVD.L achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly lower than USFM.L's 11.53% return.


UDVD.L

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
6.88%
6M
7.75%
1Y
13.07%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
8.88%

USFM.L

1D
0.42%
1M
4.26%
YTD
11.53%
6M
12.87%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDVD.L vs. USFM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
6.88%8.57%7.64%2.06%-0.33%25.04%0.77%22.66%-3.94%13.95%
USFM.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
11.53%13.71%18.11%16.29%-13.57%24.98%14.18%30.60%-6.02%15.88%

Correlation

The correlation between UDVD.L and USFM.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2017

0.74

The correlation between UDVD.L and USFM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UDVD.L vs. USFM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDVD.L
USFM.L

Industrials

17.5%
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

17.0%
8.7%

Utilities

14.8%
4.0%

Financial Services

11.5%
15.2%

Technology

8.9%
20.8%

Basic Materials

6.4%
3.2%

Healthcare

6.2%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
6.4%

Real Estate

4.6%
2.9%

Energy

4.5%
3.3%

Communication Services

3.5%
6.4%

Industrials

UDVD.L
17.5%
USFM.L
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

UDVD.L
17.0%
USFM.L
8.7%

Utilities

UDVD.L
14.8%
USFM.L
4.0%

Financial Services

UDVD.L
11.5%
USFM.L
15.2%

Technology

UDVD.L
8.9%
USFM.L
20.8%

Basic Materials

UDVD.L
6.4%
USFM.L
3.2%

Healthcare

UDVD.L
6.2%
USFM.L
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

UDVD.L
5.2%
USFM.L
6.4%

Real Estate

UDVD.L
4.6%
USFM.L
2.9%

Energy

UDVD.L
4.5%
USFM.L
3.3%

Communication Services

UDVD.L
3.5%
USFM.L
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDVD.L vs. USFM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDVD.L
UDVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

USFM.L
USFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
USFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
USFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDVD.L vs. USFM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UDVD.LUSFM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.41

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

3.40

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.71

14.12

-9.41

UDVD.L vs. USFM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the USFM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDVD.L and USFM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UDVD.LUSFM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

2.34

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.72

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.82

-0.11

Drawdowns

UDVD.L vs. USFM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDVD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, roughly equal to the maximum USFM.L drawdown of -35.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDVD.L and USFM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDVD.LUSFM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-35.45%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.06%

-6.96%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-16.05%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.26%

-22.41%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

0.00%

-3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-4.68%

+1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

1.68%

+1.09%

Volatility

UDVD.L vs. USFM.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) have volatilities of 2.84% and 2.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDVD.LUSFM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.90%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.08%

7.48%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

10.14%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

14.46%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.70%

16.21%

-0.51%

UDVD.L vs. USFM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDVD.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than USFM.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDVD.L vs. USFM.L - Dividend Comparison

UDVD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than USFM.L's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.05%2.17%2.03%2.24%2.13%2.15%2.36%2.01%2.27%1.78%1.83%2.06%
USFM.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.07%1.20%1.14%1.37%1.22%1.01%1.34%1.30%1.37%0.30%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDVD.L and USFM.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USFM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USFM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UDVD.L.

UDVD.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while USFM.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UDVD.L and 0.25% for USFM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDVD.L and USFM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer