PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDVD.L vs. FSWD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDVD.L vs. FSWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) and iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UDVD.L is traded in USD, while FSWD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FSWD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDVD.L achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly lower than FSWD.L's 13.21% return. Over the past 10 years, UDVD.L has underperformed FSWD.L with an annualized return of 8.82%, while FSWD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.84% annualized return.


UDVD.L

1D
1.32%
1M
1.97%
6M
7.08%
YTD
11.98%
1Y
16.32%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*
8.82%

FSWD.L

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.72%
6M
12.18%
YTD
13.21%
1Y
27.80%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
11.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDVD.L vs. FSWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
11.98%8.57%7.64%2.06%-0.33%25.05%0.77%22.65%-3.94%15.73%
FSWD.L
iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
13.21%26.00%16.89%14.80%-15.51%21.00%10.16%22.35%-12.59%26.17%

Correlation

The correlation between UDVD.L and FSWD.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2015

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between UDVD.L and FSWD.L has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDVD.L vs. FSWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDVD.L
UDVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FSWD.L
FSWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FSWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FSWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDVD.L vs. FSWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) and iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UDVD.LFSWD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.40

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

3.47

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.77

14.33

-8.55

UDVD.L vs. FSWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the FSWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDVD.L and FSWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UDVD.L vs. FSWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDVD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum FSWD.L drawdown of -41.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDVD.L and FSWD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDVD.LFSWD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-41.16%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.06%

-7.98%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-18.85%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.26%

-25.01%

+9.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.12%

-34.31%

-1.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.25%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-12.27%

+8.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

1.94%

+0.88%

Volatility

UDVD.L vs. FSWD.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L) at 2.91%. This indicates that UDVD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDVD.LFSWD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

2.91%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

9.61%

-2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.92%

12.16%

-2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

20.21%

-6.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

18.37%

-2.70%

UDVD.L vs. FSWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDVD.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FSWD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDVD.L vs. FSWD.L - Dividend Comparison

UDVD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while FSWD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSWD.L
iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.00%2.17%2.03%2.24%2.13%2.15%2.36%2.01%2.27%1.78%1.83%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDVD.L and FSWD.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FSWD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FSWD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UDVD.L.

UDVD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FSWD.L is Global Equities. UDVD.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while FSWD.L tracks STOXX Developed World Equity Factor Screened Net Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UDVD.L and 0.30% for FSWD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDVD.L and FSWD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer