PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDN vs. ACLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDN vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund (UDN) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDN achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than ACLO's 2.19% return.


UDN

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
0.84%
1Y
0.95%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
-0.62%
10Y*
-0.44%

ACLO

1D
0.01%
1M
0.44%
YTD
2.19%
6M
2.57%
1Y
5.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDN vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UDN
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund
-0.27%12.37%-1.97%
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
2.19%5.32%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between UDN and ACLO is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024

-0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDN vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDN
UDN Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
UDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDN Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
UDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ACLO
ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDN vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund (UDN) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UDNACLODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.16

7.30

-7.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.27

14.87

-14.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

3.41

-2.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

19.64

-19.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.82

162.50

-161.69

UDN vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDN Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDN and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UDNACLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

7.30

-7.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

5.09

-5.18

Drawdowns

UDN vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDN drawdown since its inception was -41.67%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDN and ACLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDNACLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.67%

-1.01%

-40.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.54%

-0.27%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.46%

0.00%

-27.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.61%

-0.05%

-20.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

0.03%

+2.07%

Volatility

UDN vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund (UDN) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.14%. This indicates that UDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDNACLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

0.14%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.23%

0.57%

+3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.13%

0.73%

+5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.42%

1.08%

+6.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.92%

1.08%

+5.84%

UDN vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDN has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDN vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

UDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than ACLO's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
4.91%4.87%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UDN
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund
2.94%2.94%5.33%5.21%0.69%0.00%0.00%1.38%1.26%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDN and ACLO have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UDN has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to ACLO (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDN dropped -41.67% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

On 1-year performance, ACLO leads with 5.32% vs 0.95% for UDN. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ACLO has performed better with a 5.32% return vs 0.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for UDN.

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 2.94% for UDN.

UDN is categorized as Currency, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for UDN and 0.20% for ACLO.

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.30 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDN and ACLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer