PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDBPX vs. PSAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDBPX vs. PSAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX) and PIMCO Global Advantage Strategy Bond Fund (PSAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDBPX achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than PSAIX's 0.32% return.


UDBPX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
0.06%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
3.74%
3Y*
3.58%
5Y*
0.27%
10Y*

PSAIX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.66%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.92%
1Y
6.01%
3Y*
6.00%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
3.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDBPX vs. PSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UDBPX
UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund
0.06%6.96%1.55%4.53%-10.41%-2.43%6.80%6.79%2.03%
PSAIX
PIMCO Global Advantage Strategy Bond Fund
0.32%8.87%3.21%7.91%-11.07%1.11%7.76%8.94%0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between UDBPX and PSAIX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2018

0.60

The correlation between UDBPX and PSAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDBPX vs. PSAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDBPX
UDBPX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UDBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UDBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PSAIX
PSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
PSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDBPX vs. PSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX) and PIMCO Global Advantage Strategy Bond Fund (PSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UDBPXPSAIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.45

-0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

2.07

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.30

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

1.45

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.26

4.91

+0.34

UDBPX vs. PSAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDBPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the PSAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDBPX and PSAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UDBPXPSAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.45

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.47

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.84

-0.41

Drawdowns

UDBPX vs. PSAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDBPX drawdown since its inception was -15.45%, roughly equal to the maximum PSAIX drawdown of -15.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDBPX and PSAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDBPXPSAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.45%

-15.35%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.25%

-4.61%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.03%

-4.61%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.55%

-15.35%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-1.78%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-3.31%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

1.36%

-0.63%

Volatility

UDBPX vs. PSAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX) is 1.04%, while PIMCO Global Advantage Strategy Bond Fund (PSAIX) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that UDBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDBPXPSAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

1.69%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.35%

3.77%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.48%

4.26%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.99%

3.97%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

3.67%

+0.83%

UDBPX vs. PSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDBPX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PSAIX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDBPX vs. PSAIX - Dividend Comparison

UDBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than PSAIX's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSAIX
PIMCO Global Advantage Strategy Bond Fund
4.29%4.22%3.66%3.14%4.10%4.61%2.20%2.79%2.43%1.83%2.03%2.52%
UDBPX
UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund
3.61%3.12%2.84%2.15%1.46%1.03%4.11%2.69%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDBPX and PSAIX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSAIX has higher volatility (1.69%) compared to UDBPX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDBPX dropped -15.45% vs PSAIX's -15.35%.

PSAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDBPX and PSAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer