UDBPX vs. DGSFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UDBPX (UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund) and DGSFX (DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, UDBPX returned 0.33%/yr vs -0.01%/yr for DGSFX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UDBPX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for DGSFX.

Performance

UDBPX vs. DGSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX) and DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio (DGSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDBPX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than DGSFX's 1.19% return.

UDBPX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: -0.06%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: 3.62%
• 5Y*: 0.33%
• 10Y*: —

DGSFX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.06%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 6M: 0.92%
• 1Y: 3.38%
• 3Y*: 4.55%
• 5Y*: -0.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDBPX vs. DGSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
UDBPX UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund	0.16%	6.96%	1.55%	4.53%	-10.41%	-2.43%	6.80%	6.79%	2.75%
DGSFX DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio	1.19%	3.80%	2.60%	9.67%	-15.61%	-2.95%	7.99%	9.85%	1.15%

Correlation

The correlation between UDBPX and DGSFX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018	0.84

The correlation between UDBPX and DGSFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UDBPX vs. DGSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDBPX

UDBPX Risk / Return Rank: 20
UDBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
UDBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
UDBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
UDBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
UDBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

DGSFX

DGSFX Risk / Return Rank: 12
DGSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
DGSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
DGSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
DGSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
DGSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDBPX vs. DGSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX) and DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio (DGSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UDBPX	DGSFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	0.98	+0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	1.41	+0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.18	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	1.21	+0.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.63	3.35	+2.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UDBPX vs. DGSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDBPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the DGSFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDBPX and DGSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UDBPX	DGSFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	0.98	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	-0.00	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.41	+0.03

Drawdowns

UDBPX vs. DGSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDBPX drawdown since its inception was -15.45%, smaller than the maximum DGSFX drawdown of -21.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDBPX and DGSFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	UDBPX	DGSFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.45%	-21.57%	+6.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.25%	-2.91%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.03%	-3.68%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.55%	-21.29%	+6.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-3.29%	+1.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.11%	-6.60%	+1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.73%	1.05%	-0.32%

Volatility

UDBPX vs. DGSFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund (UDBPX) is 1.05%, while DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio (DGSFX) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that UDBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UDBPX	DGSFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.05%	1.32%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.35%	2.75%	-0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.47%	3.62%	-0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.99%	5.35%	-0.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.50%	4.88%	-0.38%

UDBPX vs. DGSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDBPX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DGSFX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UDBPX vs. DGSFX - Dividend Comparison

UDBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than DGSFX's 3.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DGSFX DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio	3.54%	3.02%	4.26%	4.09%	1.97%	1.15%	1.72%	3.37%	0.24%
UDBPX UBS Sustainable Development Bank Bond Fund	3.61%	3.12%	2.84%	2.15%	1.46%	1.03%	4.11%	2.69%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UDBPX and DGSFX in my portfolio?

UDBPX and DGSFX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UDBPX or DGSFX?

DGSFX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to UDBPX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDBPX dropped -15.45% vs DGSFX's -21.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UDBPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.