PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UD08.L vs. ROLL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UD08.L vs. ROLL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD08.L) and iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ROLL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UD08.L is traded in GBp, while ROLL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ROLL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UD08.L achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly lower than ROLL.L's 22.67% return.


UD08.L

1D
1.00%
1M
-5.10%
6M
10.06%
YTD
16.20%
1Y
28.26%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*

ROLL.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
6M
15.72%
YTD
22.67%
1Y
32.79%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UD08.L vs. ROLL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UD08.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc
16.20%18.86%6.39%-6.29%12.33%33.73%-3.77%7.94%-15.22%
ROLL.L
iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
22.67%8.61%6.51%-7.11%30.54%28.89%-2.13%1.26%-9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between UD08.L and ROLL.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018

0.63

The correlation between UD08.L and ROLL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UD08.L vs. ROLL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UD08.L
UD08.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
UD08.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD08.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD08.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
UD08.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD08.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ROLL.L
ROLL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ROLL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROLL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROLL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ROLL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROLL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UD08.L vs. ROLL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD08.L) and iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ROLL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UD08.LROLL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

2.73

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.77

8.93

-0.16

UD08.L vs. ROLL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UD08.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the ROLL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UD08.L and ROLL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UD08.L vs. ROLL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UD08.L drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, which is greater than ROLL.L's maximum drawdown of -23.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD08.L and ROLL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UD08.LROLL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.62%

-23.20%

-17.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-12.10%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.21%

-13.37%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.66%

-20.56%

-4.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.13%

-8.08%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.21%

-9.49%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.70%

-0.58%

Volatility

UD08.L vs. ROLL.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD08.L) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ROLL.L) at 4.16%. This indicates that UD08.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROLL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UD08.LROLL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

4.16%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

15.01%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.63%

17.18%

-2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

16.41%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

15.42%

+1.70%

UD08.L vs. ROLL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UD08.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than ROLL.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

UD08.L vs. ROLL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UD08.L nor ROLL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UD08.L and ROLL.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ROLL.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ROLL.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UD08.L.

UD08.L tracks UBS CMCI Ex-Agriculture Ex-Livestock Capped (GBP Hedged), while ROLL.L tracks iShares Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Swap UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UD08.L and 0.28% for ROLL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UD08.L and ROLL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer