PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UD07.L vs. WCOG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UD07.L vs. WCOG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) and WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD (WCOG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UD07.L achieves a 21.43% return, which is significantly lower than WCOG.L's 32.75% return.


UD07.L

1D
0.85%
1M
1.49%
YTD
21.43%
6M
20.72%
1Y
35.14%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*

WCOG.L

1D
0.97%
1M
0.72%
YTD
32.75%
6M
32.96%
1Y
46.54%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
9.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UD07.L vs. WCOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UD07.L
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
21.43%9.88%6.26%-10.97%32.08%31.93%-1.26%2.82%-2.04%
WCOG.L
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD
32.75%7.94%4.45%-12.14%26.35%28.38%-2.08%3.07%-2.46%

Correlation

The correlation between UD07.L and WCOG.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2018

0.93

The correlation between UD07.L and WCOG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UD07.L vs. WCOG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UD07.L
UD07.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
UD07.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD07.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD07.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
UD07.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD07.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

WCOG.L
WCOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
WCOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
WCOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UD07.L vs. WCOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) and WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD (WCOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UD07.LWCOG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.47

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.37

6.80

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

16.97

-3.20

UD07.L vs. WCOG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UD07.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the WCOG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UD07.L and WCOG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UD07.LWCOG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.59

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.85

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.66

-0.24

Drawdowns

UD07.L vs. WCOG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UD07.L drawdown since its inception was -39.71%, which is greater than WCOG.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD07.L and WCOG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UD07.LWCOG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.71%

-27.05%

-12.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.51%

-6.82%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.61%

-13.63%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.71%

-27.05%

-12.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.33%

-2.59%

-8.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-10.98%

-7.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.74%

-0.19%

Volatility

UD07.L vs. WCOG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) is 5.26%, while WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD (WCOG.L) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that UD07.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WCOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UD07.LWCOG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

6.16%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

15.64%

-3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.87%

17.89%

-3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.79%

15.32%

+13.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.77%

14.02%

+9.75%

UD07.L vs. WCOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UD07.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than WCOG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

UD07.L vs. WCOG.L - Dividend Comparison

UD07.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WCOG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
UD07.L
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WCOG.L
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD
2.64%4.56%4.54%0.65%0.00%0.30%1.64%1.64%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, UD07.L and WCOG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, UD07.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UD07.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WCOG.L.

UD07.L tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while WCOG.L tracks Optimised Roll Commodity. They also come from different issuers: UBS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UD07.L and 0.35% for WCOG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UD07.L and WCOG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer