UD07.L vs. UC04.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UD07.L (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and UC04.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - UD07.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while UC04.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UD07.L returned 13.48%/yr vs 14.74%/yr for UC04.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UD07.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for UC04.L.

Performance

UD07.L vs. UC04.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UD07.L achieves a 21.43% return, which is significantly higher than UC04.L's 10.49% return.

UD07.L

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 21.43%
• 6M: 20.72%
• 1Y: 35.14%
• 3Y*: 12.39%
• 5Y*: 13.48%
• 10Y*: —

UC04.L

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 6.12%
• YTD: 10.49%
• 6M: 10.42%
• 1Y: 28.87%
• 3Y*: 19.46%
• 5Y*: 14.74%
• 10Y*: 16.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UD07.L vs. UC04.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
UD07.L UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	21.43%	9.88%	6.26%	-10.97%	32.08%	31.93%	-1.26%	2.82%	-2.04%
UC04.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	10.49%	9.28%	27.38%	20.52%	-10.51%	28.96%	16.61%	26.56%	1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between UD07.L and UC04.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2018	0.26

The correlation between UD07.L and UC04.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UD07.L vs. UC04.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UD07.L	UC04.L
Communication Services	55.9%	10.9%
Technology	16.1%	37.7%
Industrials	7.2%	8.1%
Financial Services	6.2%	11.2%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	9.9%
Healthcare	3.1%	8.5%
Utilities	2.2%	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.9%	4.7%
Energy	1.4%	3.4%
Basic Materials	0.7%	1.7%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.9%

Return for Risk

UD07.L vs. UC04.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UD07.L

UD07.L Risk / Return Rank: 74
UD07.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
UD07.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
UD07.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
UD07.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UD07.L Martin Ratio Rank: 74

UC04.L

UC04.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
UC04.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
UC04.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
UC04.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
UC04.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
UC04.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UD07.L vs. UC04.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UD07.L	UC04.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.70	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	3.61	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.50	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.37	3.75	+1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.77	13.08	+0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UD07.L vs. UC04.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UD07.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the UC04.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UD07.L and UC04.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UD07.L	UC04.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	2.70	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	1.01	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.98	-0.56

Drawdowns

UD07.L vs. UC04.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UD07.L drawdown since its inception was -39.71%, which is greater than UC04.L's maximum drawdown of -25.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD07.L and UC04.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UD07.L	UC04.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.71%	-25.93%	-13.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.51%	-7.67%	+1.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.61%	-21.14%	+8.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.71%	-21.14%	-18.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.33%	-0.18%	-11.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.80%	-3.46%	-15.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	2.20%	+0.35%

Volatility

UD07.L vs. UC04.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L) at 2.71%. This indicates that UD07.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC04.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UD07.L	UC04.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	2.71%	+2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.50%	7.24%	+5.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.87%	10.70%	+4.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.79%	14.66%	+14.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.77%	15.87%	+7.90%

UD07.L vs. UC04.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UD07.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than UC04.L's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

UD07.L vs. UC04.L - Dividend Comparison

UD07.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC04.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UC04.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	0.85%	0.96%	0.95%	1.12%	1.19%	0.89%	1.28%	1.40%	1.50%	1.32%	1.52%	1.44%
UD07.L UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UD07.L and UC04.L in my portfolio?

UD07.L and UC04.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UD07.L or UC04.L?

On fees, UC04.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UD07.L or UC04.L?

UC04.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UD07.L.

What is the main difference between UD07.L and UC04.L?

UD07.L is categorized as Commodities, while UC04.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. UD07.L tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while UC04.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UD07.L and 0.14% for UC04.L.