UD07.L vs. SPDM.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UD07.L (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and SPDM.L (iShares Physical Palladium ETC) are both Commodities funds - UD07.L tracks the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity while SPDM.L tracks the London Palladium PM Fix. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UD07.L returned 13.21%/yr vs -13.18%/yr for SPDM.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UD07.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPDM.L.

Performance

UD07.L vs. SPDM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) and iShares Physical Palladium ETC (SPDM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UD07.L achieves a 19.95% return, which is significantly higher than SPDM.L's -15.50% return.

UD07.L

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: -1.41%
• YTD: 19.95%
• 6M: 19.54%
• 1Y: 33.96%
• 3Y*: 11.52%
• 5Y*: 13.21%
• 10Y*: —

SPDM.L

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: -9.97%
• YTD: -15.50%
• 6M: -8.50%
• 1Y: 35.48%
• 3Y*: -4.70%
• 5Y*: -13.18%
• 10Y*: 9.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UD07.L vs. SPDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
UD07.L UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	19.95%	9.88%	6.26%	-10.97%	32.08%	31.93%	-1.26%	2.82%	-2.04%
SPDM.L iShares Physical Palladium ETC	-15.50%	62.20%	-17.63%	-41.15%	5.58%	-19.60%	19.23%	47.36%	38.23%

Correlation

The correlation between UD07.L and SPDM.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2018	0.28

Return for Risk

UD07.L vs. SPDM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UD07.L

UD07.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
UD07.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
UD07.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
UD07.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
UD07.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UD07.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

SPDM.L

SPDM.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
SPDM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SPDM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
SPDM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 24
SPDM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
SPDM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UD07.L vs. SPDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) and iShares Physical Palladium ETC (SPDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UD07.L	SPDM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	0.74	+1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	1.21	+1.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.16	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.19	0.91	+4.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.25	1.98	+11.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UD07.L vs. SPDM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UD07.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the SPDM.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UD07.L and SPDM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UD07.L	SPDM.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27	0.74	+1.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	-0.31	+0.77
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.14	+0.27

Drawdowns

UD07.L vs. SPDM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UD07.L drawdown since its inception was -39.71%, smaller than the maximum SPDM.L drawdown of -70.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD07.L and SPDM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UD07.L	SPDM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.71%	-70.87%	+31.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.51%	-36.26%	+29.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.61%	-40.59%	+27.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.71%	-70.87%	+31.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.41%	-57.32%	+44.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.80%	-25.10%	+6.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	16.70%	-14.14%

Volatility

UD07.L vs. SPDM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) is 5.12%, while iShares Physical Palladium ETC (SPDM.L) has a volatility of 10.52%. This indicates that UD07.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UD07.L	SPDM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.12%	10.52%	-5.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.57%	37.20%	-24.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.93%	44.75%	-29.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.79%	41.86%	-13.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.77%	37.58%	-13.81%

UD07.L vs. SPDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UD07.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDM.L's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

UD07.L vs. SPDM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UD07.L nor SPDM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UD07.L and SPDM.L in my portfolio?

UD07.L and SPDM.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UD07.L or SPDM.L?

On fees, SPDM.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UD07.L or SPDM.L?

SPDM.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UD07.L.

What is the main difference between UD07.L and SPDM.L?

UD07.L tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while SPDM.L tracks London Palladium PM Fix. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UD07.L and 0.20% for SPDM.L.