UD07.L vs. GDIG.L
UD07.L (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and GDIG.L (VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UD07.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while GDIG.L is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UD07.L returned 13.48%/yr vs 15.86%/yr for GDIG.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UD07.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GDIG.L.
Performance
UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UD07.L is traded in GBp, while GDIG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GDIG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UD07.L achieves a 21.43% return, which is significantly higher than GDIG.L's 18.14% return.
UD07.L
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 21.43%
- 6M
- 20.72%
- 1Y
- 35.14%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
GDIG.L
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 18.14%
- 6M
- 25.38%
- 1Y
- 88.23%
- 3Y*
- 26.82%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UD07.L UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.43% | 9.88% | 6.26% | -10.97% | 32.08% | 31.93% | -1.26% | 2.82% | -1.88% |
GDIG.L VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF | 18.14% | 77.01% | -7.08% | -0.65% | 15.96% | 8.15% | 27.51% | 20.58% | -6.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between UD07.L and GDIG.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UD07.L and GDIG.L has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UD07.L
GDIG.L
Communication Services
-
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
UD07.L
GDIG.L
-
Technology
UD07.L
GDIG.L
Industrials
UD07.L
GDIG.L
Financial Services
UD07.L
GDIG.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
UD07.L
GDIG.L
-
Healthcare
UD07.L
GDIG.L
-
Utilities
UD07.L
GDIG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
UD07.L
GDIG.L
-
Energy
UD07.L
GDIG.L
Basic Materials
UD07.L
GDIG.L
Real Estate
UD07.L
GDIG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UD07.L vs. GDIG.L — Risk / Return Rank
UD07.L
GDIG.L
UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) and VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UD07.L | GDIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.41 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.37 | 3.77 | +1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.77 | 12.64 | +1.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UD07.L | GDIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.64 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.56 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.60 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UD07.L drawdown since its inception was -39.71%, which is greater than GDIG.L's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD07.L and GDIG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UD07.L | GDIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.71% | -33.58% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.51% | -23.29% | +16.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.61% | -23.29% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.71% | -30.31% | -9.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.33% | -10.73% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -10.42% | -8.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 6.96% | -4.41% |
Volatility
UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) is 5.26%, while VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) has a volatility of 11.96%. This indicates that UD07.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDIG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UD07.L | GDIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 11.96% | -6.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 27.77% | -15.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.87% | 33.27% | -18.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.79% | 28.51% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.77% | 27.67% | -3.90% |
UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UD07.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than GDIG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UD07.L nor GDIG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UD07.L and GDIG.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UD07.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UD07.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GDIG.L.
UD07.L is categorized as Commodities, while GDIG.L is Materials. UD07.L tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while GDIG.L tracks S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UD07.L and 0.50% for GDIG.L.
Find the right allocation for UD07.L and GDIG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer