PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UD07.L vs. GDIG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) and VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UD07.L is traded in GBp, while GDIG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GDIG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UD07.L achieves a 21.43% return, which is significantly higher than GDIG.L's 18.14% return.


UD07.L

1D
0.85%
1M
1.49%
YTD
21.43%
6M
20.72%
1Y
35.14%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*

GDIG.L

1D
-2.35%
1M
5.17%
YTD
18.14%
6M
25.38%
1Y
88.23%
3Y*
26.82%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UD07.L
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
21.43%9.88%6.26%-10.97%32.08%31.93%-1.26%2.82%-1.88%
GDIG.L
VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF
18.14%77.01%-7.08%-0.65%15.96%8.15%27.51%20.58%-6.44%

Correlation

The correlation between UD07.L and GDIG.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between UD07.L and GDIG.L has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UD07.L
GDIG.L

Communication Services

55.9%

-

Technology

16.1%
0.8%

Industrials

7.2%
1.0%

Financial Services

6.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%

-

Healthcare

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.9%

-

Energy

1.4%
4.3%

Basic Materials

0.7%
93.9%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Communication Services

UD07.L
55.9%
GDIG.L

-

Technology

UD07.L
16.1%
GDIG.L
0.8%

Industrials

UD07.L
7.2%
GDIG.L
1.0%

Financial Services

UD07.L
6.2%
GDIG.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

UD07.L
5.2%
GDIG.L

-

Healthcare

UD07.L
3.1%
GDIG.L

-

Utilities

UD07.L
2.2%
GDIG.L

-

Consumer Defensive

UD07.L
1.9%
GDIG.L

-

Energy

UD07.L
1.4%
GDIG.L
4.3%

Basic Materials

UD07.L
0.7%
GDIG.L
93.9%

Real Estate

UD07.L
0.1%
GDIG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UD07.L vs. GDIG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UD07.L
UD07.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
UD07.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD07.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD07.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
UD07.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD07.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

GDIG.L
GDIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GDIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) and VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UD07.LGDIG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.37

3.77

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

12.64

+1.13

UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UD07.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the GDIG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UD07.L and GDIG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UD07.LGDIG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.64

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.56

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.60

-0.18

Drawdowns

UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UD07.L drawdown since its inception was -39.71%, which is greater than GDIG.L's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD07.L and GDIG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UD07.LGDIG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.71%

-33.58%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.51%

-23.29%

+16.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.61%

-23.29%

+10.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.71%

-30.31%

-9.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.33%

-10.73%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-10.42%

-8.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

6.96%

-4.41%

Volatility

UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) is 5.26%, while VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) has a volatility of 11.96%. This indicates that UD07.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDIG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UD07.LGDIG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

11.96%

-6.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

27.77%

-15.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.87%

33.27%

-18.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.79%

28.51%

+0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.77%

27.67%

-3.90%

UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UD07.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than GDIG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

UD07.L vs. GDIG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UD07.L nor GDIG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UD07.L and GDIG.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UD07.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UD07.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GDIG.L.

UD07.L is categorized as Commodities, while GDIG.L is Materials. UD07.L tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while GDIG.L tracks S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UD07.L and 0.50% for GDIG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UD07.L and GDIG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer