UD07.L vs. COMF.L
UD07.L (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and COMF.L (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) are both Commodities funds - UD07.L tracks the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity while COMF.L tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UD07.L returned 11.88%/yr vs 11.54%/yr for COMF.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UD07.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for COMF.L.
Performance
UD07.L vs. COMF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UD07.L is traded in GBp, while COMF.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COMF.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UD07.L achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly higher than COMF.L's 14.74% return.
UD07.L
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 11.57%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- —
COMF.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- YTD
- 14.74%
- 1Y
- 22.89%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
UD07.L vs. COMF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UD07.L UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 16.37% | 9.88% | 6.26% | -10.97% | 32.08% | 31.93% | -1.26% | 2.82% | 7,069.96% | 6.20% |
COMF.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 14.74% | 8.14% | 6.96% | -11.05% | 32.85% | 34.22% | -0.49% | 3.28% | -3.00% | 1.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between UD07.L and COMF.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between UD07.L and COMF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UD07.L vs. COMF.L — Risk / Return Rank
UD07.L
COMF.L
UD07.L vs. COMF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UD07.L | COMF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.28 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.19 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.48 | 6.78 | +1.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UD07.L vs. COMF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UD07.L drawdown since its inception was -39.71%, smaller than the maximum COMF.L drawdown of -50.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD07.L and COMF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UD07.L | COMF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.71% | -50.51% | +10.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -10.49% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.61% | -13.06% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.71% | -23.88% | -15.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.02% | -7.50% | -7.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.28% | -23.27% | +5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 3.39% | -0.29% |
Volatility
UD07.L vs. COMF.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UD07.L) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L) have volatilities of 3.42% and 3.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UD07.L | COMF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 3.57% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 12.14% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.71% | 14.53% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.80% | 15.17% | +13.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,357.49% | 14.17% | +2,343.32% |
UD07.L vs. COMF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UD07.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than COMF.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
UD07.L vs. COMF.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UD07.L nor COMF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UD07.L and COMF.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COMF.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COMF.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UD07.L.
UD07.L tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while COMF.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return. They also come from different issuers: UBS and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UD07.L and 0.30% for COMF.L.
Find the right allocation for UD07.L and COMF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer