UD06.L vs. ROLG.L
UD06.L (UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc) and ROLG.L (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD) are both Commodities funds - UD06.L tracks the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity Commodity (GBP Hedged) while ROLG.L tracks the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UD06.L returned 11.38%/yr vs 14.55%/yr for ROLG.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UD06.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for ROLG.L.
Performance
UD06.L vs. ROLG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UD06.L is traded in GBp, while ROLG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ROLG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UD06.L achieves a 19.96% return, which is significantly lower than ROLG.L's 27.75% return.
UD06.L
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 20.45%
- 1Y
- 32.58%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- —
ROLG.L
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- 27.75%
- 6M
- 27.51%
- 1Y
- 44.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 14.55%
- 10Y*
- —
UD06.L vs. ROLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UD06.L UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc | 19.96% | 17.64% | 4.23% | -6.66% | 16.62% | 29.24% | 0.29% | 3.70% | -9.32% |
ROLG.L iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD | 27.75% | 8.64% | 6.25% | -7.36% | 30.51% | 29.23% | -2.41% | 1.84% | -9.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between UD06.L and ROLG.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between UD06.L and ROLG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UD06.L vs. ROLG.L — Risk / Return Rank
UD06.L
ROLG.L
UD06.L vs. ROLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD06.L) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UD06.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.47 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | 6.47 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.83 | 18.28 | -4.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UD06.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 2.65 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.82 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.59 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
UD06.L vs. ROLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UD06.L drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, which is greater than ROLG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD06.L and ROLG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UD06.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.66% | -22.66% | -10.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.18% | -6.81% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.32% | -13.27% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.45% | -19.85% | -3.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | -4.56% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.74% | -8.98% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 2.42% | -0.07% |
Volatility
UD06.L vs. ROLG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD06.L) is 4.41%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that UD06.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UD06.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 5.90% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 13.98% | -2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.64% | 16.69% | -3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 17.69% | -2.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.71% | 16.98% | -3.27% |
UD06.L vs. ROLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UD06.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than ROLG.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
UD06.L vs. ROLG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UD06.L nor ROLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UD06.L and ROLG.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROLG.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROLG.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UD06.L.
UD06.L tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity Commodity (GBP Hedged), while ROLG.L tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UD06.L and 0.28% for ROLG.L.
Find the right allocation for UD06.L and ROLG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer