UD06.L vs. BCOM.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

UD06.L (UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc) and BCOM.L (L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF) are both Commodities funds - UD06.L tracks the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity Commodity (GBP Hedged) while BCOM.L tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UD06.L returned 10.57%/yr vs 10.75%/yr for BCOM.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UD06.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BCOM.L.

Performance

UD06.L vs. BCOM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD06.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

UD06.L is traded in GBp, while BCOM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCOM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UD06.L achieves a 16.43% return, which is significantly lower than BCOM.L's 19.63% return.

UD06.L

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 1.02%
• 6M: 11.63%
• YTD: 16.43%
• 1Y: 26.19%
• 3Y*: 11.78%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: —

BCOM.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.63%
• 6M: 14.57%
• YTD: 19.63%
• 1Y: 28.48%
• 3Y*: 11.29%
• 5Y*: 10.75%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UD06.L vs. BCOM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
UD06.L UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc	16.43%	17.64%	4.23%	-6.66%	16.62%	29.24%	0.29%	3.70%	-10.43%
BCOM.L L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF	19.63%	7.91%	6.26%	-11.88%	29.38%	28.55%	-5.84%	1.14%	-5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between UD06.L and BCOM.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2018	0.70

The correlation between UD06.L and BCOM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

UD06.L vs. BCOM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UD06.L

UD06.L Risk / Return Rank: 65
UD06.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
UD06.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
UD06.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
UD06.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
UD06.L Martin Ratio Rank: 54

BCOM.L

BCOM.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
BCOM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BCOM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BCOM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
BCOM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
BCOM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UD06.L vs. BCOM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD06.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UD06.L	BCOM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	1.59	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	2.10	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.28	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	2.18	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.62	6.67	+0.95

UD06.L vs. BCOM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UD06.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the BCOM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UD06.L and BCOM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UD06.L vs. BCOM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UD06.L drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, which is greater than BCOM.L's maximum drawdown of -27.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD06.L and BCOM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UD06.L	BCOM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.66%	-27.79%	-4.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.44%	-12.97%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.44%	-14.40%	+2.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.45%	-27.75%	+4.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.48%	-9.06%	+2.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.63%	-11.31%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	4.24%	-0.81%

Volatility

UD06.L vs. BCOM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD06.L) is 3.75%, while L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF - USD Accumulating ETF (BCOM.L) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that UD06.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCOM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UD06.L	BCOM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	4.14%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.52%	15.60%	-4.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.71%	17.79%	-4.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.61%	17.00%	-2.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.66%	16.02%	-2.36%

UD06.L vs. BCOM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UD06.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than BCOM.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

UD06.L vs. BCOM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UD06.L nor BCOM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UD06.L and BCOM.L in my portfolio?

UD06.L and BCOM.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UD06.L or BCOM.L?

On fees, BCOM.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UD06.L or BCOM.L?

BCOM.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UD06.L.

What is the main difference between UD06.L and BCOM.L?

UD06.L tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity Commodity (GBP Hedged), while BCOM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. They also come from different issuers: UBS and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UD06.L and 0.15% for BCOM.L.