PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD06.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UD06.L achieves a 19.96% return, which is significantly higher than 5ESG.L's 9.48% return.


UD06.L

1D
-0.84%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
19.96%
6M
20.45%
1Y
32.58%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*

5ESG.L

1D
0.70%
1M
4.76%
YTD
9.48%
6M
10.78%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UD06.L
UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc
19.96%17.64%4.23%-6.66%16.62%29.24%0.29%2.47%
5ESG.L
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist
9.48%18.26%23.62%26.17%-20.24%31.59%15.77%14.68%

Correlation

The correlation between UD06.L and 5ESG.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019

0.19

The correlation between UD06.L and 5ESG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UD06.L
5ESG.L

Communication Services

55.9%
14.5%

Technology

16.1%
38.6%

Industrials

7.2%
6.8%

Financial Services

6.2%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
4.6%

Healthcare

3.1%
9.3%

Utilities

2.2%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
5.1%

Energy

1.4%
4.2%

Basic Materials

0.7%
1.9%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.2%

Communication Services

UD06.L
55.9%
5ESG.L
14.5%

Technology

UD06.L
16.1%
5ESG.L
38.6%

Industrials

UD06.L
7.2%
5ESG.L
6.8%

Financial Services

UD06.L
6.2%
5ESG.L
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

UD06.L
5.2%
5ESG.L
4.6%

Healthcare

UD06.L
3.1%
5ESG.L
9.3%

Utilities

UD06.L
2.2%
5ESG.L
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

UD06.L
1.9%
5ESG.L
5.1%

Energy

UD06.L
1.4%
5ESG.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

UD06.L
0.7%
5ESG.L
1.9%

Real Estate

UD06.L
0.1%
5ESG.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UD06.L
UD06.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
UD06.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD06.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD06.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
UD06.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD06.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

5ESG.L
5ESG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
5ESG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD06.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UD06.L5ESG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.48

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.25

3.33

+1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.83

14.65

-0.82

UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UD06.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the 5ESG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UD06.L and 5ESG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UD06.L5ESG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.62

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.88

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

1.05

-0.45

Drawdowns

UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UD06.L drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, roughly equal to the maximum 5ESG.L drawdown of -31.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD06.L and 5ESG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UD06.L5ESG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-31.50%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-9.01%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.32%

-19.53%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.45%

-25.41%

+1.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.65%

-0.07%

-3.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.74%

-5.69%

-6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

2.05%

+0.30%

Volatility

UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD06.L) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) at 3.46%. This indicates that UD06.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 5ESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UD06.L5ESG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

3.46%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.62%

8.51%

+3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.64%

11.46%

+2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

16.54%

-1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.71%

19.13%

-5.42%

UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UD06.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than 5ESG.L's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Dividend Comparison

UD06.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 5ESG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
5ESG.L
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist
0.62%0.87%0.47%1.07%1.32%0.89%1.25%0.39%
UD06.L
UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UD06.L and 5ESG.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 5ESG.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

5ESG.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UD06.L.

UD06.L is categorized as Commodities, while 5ESG.L is S&P 500. UD06.L tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity Commodity (GBP Hedged), while 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UD06.L and 0.17% for 5ESG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UD06.L and 5ESG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer