UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L
UD06.L (UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc) and 5ESG.L (UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - UD06.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity Commodity (GBP Hedged), while 5ESG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UD06.L returned 11.38%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for 5ESG.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UD06.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for 5ESG.L.
Performance
UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UD06.L achieves a 19.96% return, which is significantly higher than 5ESG.L's 9.48% return.
UD06.L
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 20.45%
- 1Y
- 32.58%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- —
5ESG.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 10.78%
- 1Y
- 30.17%
- 3Y*
- 21.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- —
UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UD06.L UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc | 19.96% | 17.64% | 4.23% | -6.66% | 16.62% | 29.24% | 0.29% | 2.47% |
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 9.48% | 18.26% | 23.62% | 26.17% | -20.24% | 31.59% | 15.77% | 14.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between UD06.L and 5ESG.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019 | 0.19 |
The correlation between UD06.L and 5ESG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UD06.L
5ESG.L
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
UD06.L
5ESG.L
Technology
UD06.L
5ESG.L
Industrials
UD06.L
5ESG.L
Financial Services
UD06.L
5ESG.L
Consumer Cyclical
UD06.L
5ESG.L
Healthcare
UD06.L
5ESG.L
Utilities
UD06.L
5ESG.L
Consumer Defensive
UD06.L
5ESG.L
Energy
UD06.L
5ESG.L
Basic Materials
UD06.L
5ESG.L
Real Estate
UD06.L
5ESG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L — Risk / Return Rank
UD06.L
5ESG.L
UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD06.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UD06.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.48 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | 3.33 | +1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.83 | 14.65 | -0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UD06.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 2.62 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.88 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.05 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UD06.L drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, roughly equal to the maximum 5ESG.L drawdown of -31.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UD06.L and 5ESG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UD06.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.66% | -31.50% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.18% | -9.01% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.32% | -19.53% | +9.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.45% | -25.41% | +1.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | -0.07% | -3.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.74% | -5.69% | -6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 2.05% | +0.30% |
Volatility
UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD06.L) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) at 3.46%. This indicates that UD06.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 5ESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UD06.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 3.46% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 8.51% | +3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.64% | 11.46% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 16.54% | -1.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.71% | 19.13% | -5.42% |
UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UD06.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than 5ESG.L's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
UD06.L vs. 5ESG.L - Dividend Comparison
UD06.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 5ESG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 0.62% | 0.87% | 0.47% | 1.07% | 1.32% | 0.89% | 1.25% | 0.39% |
UD06.L UBS ETF (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UD06.L and 5ESG.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 5ESG.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
5ESG.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UD06.L.
UD06.L is categorized as Commodities, while 5ESG.L is S&P 500. UD06.L tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity Commodity (GBP Hedged), while 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UD06.L and 0.17% for 5ESG.L.
Find the right allocation for UD06.L and 5ESG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer