PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCRP.DE vs. PRAP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UCRP.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF DR (Acc) (UCRP.DE) and Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (PRAP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UCRP.DE having a 3.24% return and PRAP.DE slightly higher at 3.31%.


UCRP.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.82%
6M
2.96%
YTD
3.24%
1Y
6.79%
3Y*
3.27%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*

PRAP.DE

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.93%
6M
3.54%
YTD
3.31%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
3.45%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCRP.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UCRP.DE
Amundi USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF DR (Acc)
3.24%-4.44%7.79%4.77%-9.83%6.55%-2.40%
PRAP.DE
Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
3.31%-3.96%7.69%4.70%-10.24%6.82%-11.43%

Correlation

The correlation between UCRP.DE and PRAP.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020

0.91

The correlation between UCRP.DE and PRAP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UCRP.DE vs. PRAP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCRP.DE
UCRP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
UCRP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCRP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCRP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
UCRP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCRP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAP.DE
PRAP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PRAP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCRP.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF DR (Acc) (UCRP.DE) and Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (PRAP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UCRP.DEPRAP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.95

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.77

5.14

+0.63

UCRP.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCRP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the PRAP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCRP.DE and PRAP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UCRP.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCRP.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.40%, smaller than the maximum PRAP.DE drawdown of -18.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCRP.DE and PRAP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UCRP.DEPRAP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.40%

-18.71%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

-3.62%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.27%

-11.80%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.94%

-13.30%

+0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.97%

-5.56%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-10.15%

+4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.38%

-0.21%

Volatility

UCRP.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF DR (Acc) (UCRP.DE) and Amundi Core USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (PRAP.DE) have volatilities of 1.70% and 1.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UCRP.DEPRAP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

1.73%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.95%

4.18%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.74%

6.18%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.35%

8.34%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.07%

9.57%

-0.50%

UCRP.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCRP.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAP.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UCRP.DE vs. PRAP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither UCRP.DE nor PRAP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, UCRP.DE and PRAP.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PRAP.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRAP.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for UCRP.DE.

UCRP.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate SRI Index, while PRAP.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corporate Liquid Issuer Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for UCRP.DE and 0.07% for PRAP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UCRP.DE and PRAP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer