UCPIX vs. RYCLX
UCPIX (ProFunds UltraShort Small Cap Fund) and RYCLX (Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, UCPIX returned -10.82%/yr vs -11.59%/yr for RYCLX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UCPIX charges 1.78%/yr vs 2.39%/yr for RYCLX.
Performance
UCPIX vs. RYCLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCPIX achieves a -33.57% return, which is significantly lower than RYCLX's -13.20% return. Over the past 10 years, UCPIX has outperformed RYCLX with an annualized return of -10.82%, while RYCLX has yielded a comparatively lower -11.59% annualized return.
UCPIX
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- YTD
- -33.57%
- 6M
- -30.28%
- 1Y
- -51.58%
- 3Y*
- 47.09%
- 5Y*
- 29.28%
- 10Y*
- -10.82%
RYCLX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- YTD
- -13.20%
- 6M
- -11.65%
- 1Y
- -16.11%
- 3Y*
- -8.94%
- 5Y*
- -6.04%
- 10Y*
- -11.59%
UCPIX vs. RYCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCPIX ProFunds UltraShort Small Cap Fund | -33.57% | -25.76% | 707.30% | -26.54% | 28.08% | -36.02% | -60.58% | -38.99% | 17.86% | -27.19% |
RYCLX Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund | -13.20% | -1.04% | -5.59% | -8.75% | 8.93% | -24.21% | -25.53% | -21.03% | 11.39% | -14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCPIX and RYCLX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005 | 0.95 |
The correlation between UCPIX and RYCLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCPIX vs. RYCLX — Risk / Return Rank
UCPIX
RYCLX
UCPIX vs. RYCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraShort Small Cap Fund (UCPIX) and Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund (RYCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCPIX | RYCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 0.84 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.02 | -0.96 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.70 | -1.90 | +0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCPIX vs. RYCLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, roughly equal to the maximum RYCLX drawdown of -95.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCPIX and RYCLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCPIX | RYCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.90% | -95.61% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.41% | -17.57% | -33.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.50% | -31.65% | -36.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.50% | -34.22% | -34.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.03% | -71.64% | -22.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.48% | -95.61% | -3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.99% | -70.23% | -13.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.21% | 9.04% | +23.17% |
Volatility
UCPIX vs. RYCLX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds UltraShort Small Cap Fund (UCPIX) has a higher volatility of 12.77% compared to Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund (RYCLX) at 4.58%. This indicates that UCPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCPIX | RYCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.77% | 4.58% | +8.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.77% | 11.73% | +17.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.47% | 15.89% | +23.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 400.24% | 20.57% | +379.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 284.83% | 21.49% | +263.34% |
UCPIX vs. RYCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is lower than RYCLX's 2.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
UCPIX vs. RYCLX - Dividend Comparison
UCPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, less than RYCLX's 38.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCLX Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund | 38.03% | 33.01% | 25.75% | 9.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.89% |
UCPIX ProFunds UltraShort Small Cap Fund | 6.95% | 4.61% | 4.24% | 4.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, UCPIX and RYCLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
UCPIX has higher volatility (12.77%) compared to RYCLX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCPIX dropped -99.90% vs RYCLX's -95.61%.
RYCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.06 vs -1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCPIX and RYCLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer