PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCON vs. CRED
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UCON vs. CRED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON) and Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UCON vs. CRED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UCON
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF
-0.44%7.00%4.69%4.45%
CRED
Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF
3.55%-2.30%5.21%13.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCON achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than CRED's 3.55% return.


UCON

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
0.59%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
5.76%
5Y*
2.67%
10Y*

CRED

1D
0.42%
1M
-5.99%
YTD
3.55%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
0.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UCON vs. CRED - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCON has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than CRED's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UCON vs. CRED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCON
UCON Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UCON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCON Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCON Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
UCON Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCON Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

CRED
CRED Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CRED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRED Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
CRED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRED Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCON vs. CRED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON) and Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UCONCREDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

0.02

+1.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

0.13

+2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.02

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

0.04

+1.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.70

0.12

+8.58

UCON vs. CRED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCON Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the CRED Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCON and CRED, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UCONCREDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

0.02

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.40

+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between UCON and CRED is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

UCON vs. CRED - Dividend Comparison

UCON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than CRED's 4.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
UCON
First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF
4.66%4.63%4.95%4.75%3.12%2.20%3.14%3.25%1.76%
CRED
Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF
4.92%5.50%4.82%2.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UCON vs. CRED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCON drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum CRED drawdown of -17.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCON and CRED.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UCONCREDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-17.59%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.45%

-11.36%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-7.24%

+5.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-5.88%

+4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

3.94%

-3.38%

Volatility

UCON vs. CRED - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust TCW Unconstrained Plus Bond ETF (UCON) is 1.55%, while Columbia Research Enhanced Real Estate ETF (CRED) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that UCON experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UCONCREDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

4.35%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.07%

9.05%

-6.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92%

15.43%

-12.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.84%

16.37%

-12.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.94%

16.37%

-10.43%