UCEQX vs. DGLRX
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) and BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund (DGLRX).
UCEQX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Jun 7, 2012. DGLRX is managed by Dreyfus. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006.
Performance
UCEQX vs. DGLRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UCEQX vs. DGLRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund | -0.78% | 23.71% | 14.50% | 19.36% | -16.25% | 19.68% | 10.76% | 22.49% | -12.06% | 22.59% |
DGLRX BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund | -5.04% | 8.59% | 17.14% | 21.48% | -19.14% | 17.63% | 19.50% | 29.57% | -1.69% | 24.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCEQX achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly higher than DGLRX's -5.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UCEQX having a 10.39% annualized return and DGLRX not far ahead at 10.53%.
UCEQX
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 22.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
DGLRX
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- -5.04%
- 6M
- -4.79%
- 1Y
- 6.14%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UCEQX vs. DGLRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCEQX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DGLRX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UCEQX vs. DGLRX — Risk / Return Rank
UCEQX
DGLRX
UCEQX vs. DGLRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) and BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund (DGLRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UCEQX | DGLRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 0.41 | +0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 0.71 | +1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.09 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 0.61 | +1.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | 2.18 | +7.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UCEQX | DGLRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 0.41 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.40 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.46 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between UCEQX and DGLRX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UCEQX vs. DGLRX - Dividend Comparison
UCEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, less than DGLRX's 32.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund | 5.12% | 5.08% | 2.56% | 5.10% | 6.80% | 4.61% | 8.25% | 4.79% | 6.73% | 1.91% | 3.16% | 3.63% |
DGLRX BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund | 32.66% | 30.57% | 17.41% | 17.89% | 11.97% | 8.65% | 5.71% | 5.00% | 7.11% | 8.01% | 3.83% | 6.46% |
Drawdowns
UCEQX vs. DGLRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCEQX drawdown since its inception was -35.33%, smaller than the maximum DGLRX drawdown of -43.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCEQX and DGLRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCEQX | DGLRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.33% | -43.83% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.75% | -11.27% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.24% | -29.20% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.33% | -29.20% | -6.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.34% | -8.75% | +2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -5.97% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 3.17% | -0.74% |
Volatility
UCEQX vs. DGLRX - Volatility Comparison
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund (DGLRX) at 5.31%. This indicates that UCEQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGLRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UCEQX | DGLRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.93% | 5.31% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 9.66% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.60% | 16.35% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 16.52% | -1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 16.62% | -0.16% |