PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UC99.L vs. UC04.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UC99.L vs. UC04.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UC99.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and UC04.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from UBS tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC99.L returned 16.19%/yr vs 16.01%/yr for UC04.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UC99.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for UC04.L.

Performance

UC99.L vs. UC04.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UC99.L having a 10.42% return and UC04.L slightly higher at 10.50%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UC99.L having a 16.19% annualized return and UC04.L not far behind at 16.01%.

UC99.L

1D
0.63%
1M
6.73%
YTD
10.42%
6M
10.82%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
16.19%

UC04.L

1D
0.01%
1M
5.66%
YTD
10.50%
6M
10.32%
1Y
28.86%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
16.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC99.L vs. UC04.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UC99.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		10.42%8.68%22.60%27.58%-15.03%28.64%16.43%32.55%0.49%12.84%
UC04.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		10.50%9.28%27.38%20.52%-10.51%28.96%16.61%26.56%-0.32%10.74%

Correlation

The correlation between UC99.L and UC04.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.94

The correlation between UC99.L and UC04.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

UC99.L vs. UC04.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UC99.L
UC04.L

Technology

54.7%
37.7%

Industrials

13.3%
8.1%

Healthcare

10.9%
8.5%

Communication Services

7.9%
10.9%

Financial Services

7.3%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
4.7%

Utilities

0.1%
2.1%

Basic Materials

0.0%
1.7%

Energy

-

3.4%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

UC99.L
54.7%
UC04.L
37.7%

Industrials

UC99.L
13.3%
UC04.L
8.1%

Healthcare

UC99.L
10.9%
UC04.L
8.5%

Communication Services

UC99.L
7.9%
UC04.L
10.9%

Financial Services

UC99.L
7.3%
UC04.L
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

UC99.L
2.9%
UC04.L
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

UC99.L
2.8%
UC04.L
4.7%

Utilities

UC99.L
0.1%
UC04.L
2.1%

Basic Materials

UC99.L
0.0%
UC04.L
1.7%

Energy

UC99.L

-

UC04.L
3.4%

Real Estate

UC99.L

-

UC04.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

Often compared with UC99.L:
UC99.L vs. SPYUC99.L vs. EQQQ.LUC99.L vs. IUSA.LUC99.L vs. RSPTUC99.L vs. VWRP.LUC99.L vs. S5SD.LUC99.L vs. HMWO.L
Often compared with UC04.L:
UC04.L vs. SMHUC04.L vs. HMCA.LUC04.L vs. QQQUC04.L vs. ^GSPCUC04.L vs. SPX5.LUC04.L vs. SPYUC04.L vs. SEMC.L

Return for Risk

UC99.L vs. UC04.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UC99.L
UC99.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UC99.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC99.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC99.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UC99.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC99.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
UC04.L
UC04.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UC04.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC04.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC04.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UC04.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC04.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC99.L vs. UC04.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UC99.LUC04.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.41
2.70

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.35
3.61

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.50

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.74

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.14

13.07

-1.93

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC99.L vs. UC04.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC99.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the UC04.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC99.L and UC04.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UC99.LUC04.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.70

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

1.01

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

1.02

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.98

+0.02

Drawdowns

UC99.L vs. UC04.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC99.L drawdown since its inception was -23.20%, smaller than the maximum UC04.L drawdown of -25.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC99.L and UC04.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UC99.LUC04.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.20%

-25.93%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.47%

-7.67%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.20%

-21.14%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.20%

-21.14%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.20%

-25.93%

+2.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.17%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-3.46%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.20%

+0.44%

Volatility

UC99.L vs. UC04.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L) at 2.72%. This indicates that UC99.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC04.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UC99.LUC04.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

2.72%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

7.24%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

10.63%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

14.66%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

15.86%

+0.68%

UC99.L vs. UC04.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC99.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than UC04.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UC99.L vs. UC04.L - Dividend Comparison

UC99.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC04.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UC04.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		0.84%0.96%0.95%1.12%1.19%0.89%1.28%1.40%1.50%1.32%1.52%1.44%
UC99.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		0.00%0.00%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.91, UC99.L and UC04.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, UC04.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC04.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC99.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UC99.L and 0.14% for UC04.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC99.L and UC04.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer