UC99.L vs. IUQF.L
UC99.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and IUQF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from UBS and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC99.L returned 12.76%/yr vs 11.54%/yr for IUQF.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UC99.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IUQF.L.
Performance
UC99.L vs. IUQF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC99.L achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly higher than IUQF.L's 9.58% return.
UC99.L
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 23.86%
- 3Y*
- 17.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.33%
IUQF.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 19.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.87%
UC99.L vs. IUQF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 10.79% | 9.22% | 23.54% | 28.83% | -14.41% | 29.84% | 17.71% | 33.68% | 1.70% | 14.02% |
IUQF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.58% | 4.83% | 24.33% | 23.81% | -11.33% | 29.25% | 12.16% | 29.08% | -2.19% | -8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC99.L and IUQF.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2016 | 0.90 |
The correlation between UC99.L and IUQF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
UC99.L vs. IUQF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UC99.L
IUQF.L
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
UC99.L
IUQF.L
Healthcare
UC99.L
IUQF.L
Industrials
UC99.L
IUQF.L
Financial Services
UC99.L
IUQF.L
Communication Services
UC99.L
IUQF.L
Consumer Defensive
UC99.L
IUQF.L
Consumer Cyclical
UC99.L
IUQF.L
Basic Materials
UC99.L
IUQF.L
Utilities
UC99.L
IUQF.L
Energy
UC99.L
-
IUQF.L
Real Estate
UC99.L
-
IUQF.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC99.L vs. IUQF.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC99.L
IUQF.L
UC99.L vs. IUQF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UC99.L | IUQF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 2.91 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.16 | 10.83 | -1.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UC99.L vs. IUQF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC99.L drawdown since its inception was -23.04%, smaller than the maximum IUQF.L drawdown of -25.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC99.L and IUQF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC99.L | IUQF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.04% | -25.74% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.29% | -6.64% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.04% | -20.67% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.04% | -20.67% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -2.08% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -7.45% | +3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 1.79% | +0.81% |
Volatility
UC99.L vs. IUQF.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) at 3.26%. This indicates that UC99.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUQF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC99.L | IUQF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 3.26% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 7.16% | +1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.53% | 10.34% | +2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 20.23% | -4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 28.57% | -12.18% |
UC99.L vs. IUQF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC99.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IUQF.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UC99.L vs. IUQF.L - Dividend Comparison
UC99.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, while IUQF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUQF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.85% | 0.79% | 0.78% | 0.98% | 0.78% | 1.27% | 0.93% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, UC99.L and IUQF.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IUQF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUQF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC99.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UC99.L and 0.20% for IUQF.L.
Find the right allocation for UC99.L and IUQF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer