UC81.L vs. USDG.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

UC81.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and USDG.L (L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - UC81.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD while USDG.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC81.L returned 3.17%/yr vs 2.09%/yr for USDG.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UC81.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for USDG.L.

Performance

UC81.L vs. USDG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L) and L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (USDG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC81.L achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than USDG.L's 3.23% return.

UC81.L

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: 1.70%
• 6M: 2.46%
• 1Y: 6.49%
• 3Y*: 3.91%
• 5Y*: 3.17%
• 10Y*: 2.75%

USDG.L

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 3.00%
• YTD: 3.23%
• 6M: 4.07%
• 1Y: 8.92%
• 3Y*: 4.38%
• 5Y*: 2.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC81.L vs. USDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
UC81.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	1.70%	-0.20%	6.43%	0.38%	4.76%	0.82%
USDG.L L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF	3.23%	0.15%	4.74%	2.41%	-3.62%	-26.09%

Correlation

The correlation between UC81.L and USDG.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2021	0.85

The correlation between UC81.L and USDG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UC81.L vs. USDG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC81.L

UC81.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
UC81.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
UC81.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
UC81.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
UC81.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
UC81.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

USDG.L

USDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 35
USDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
USDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
USDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
USDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
USDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC81.L vs. USDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L) and L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (USDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UC81.L	USDG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	1.10	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	1.63	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.23	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	1.93	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.41	4.38	-0.97

UC81.L vs. USDG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC81.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the USDG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC81.L and USDG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UC81.L vs. USDG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC81.L drawdown since its inception was -36.65%, which is greater than USDG.L's maximum drawdown of -32.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC81.L and USDG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC81.L	USDG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.65%	-32.44%	-4.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.29%	-4.53%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.01%	-8.61%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.31%	-12.81%	-1.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.39%	-21.14%	+19.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.89%	-26.95%	+13.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	2.00%	-0.32%

Volatility

UC81.L vs. USDG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L) is 1.49%, while L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (USDG.L) has a volatility of 1.84%. This indicates that UC81.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USDG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC81.L	USDG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.49%	1.84%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.33%	6.85%	-2.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.90%	7.99%	-2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.78%	8.65%	-0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.04%	14.56%	-5.52%

UC81.L vs. USDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC81.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than USDG.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UC81.L vs. USDG.L - Dividend Comparison

UC81.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than USDG.L's 4.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UC81.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	4.61%	5.59%	4.76%	3.28%	1.37%	1.58%	2.75%	2.90%	2.20%	2.16%	1.86%	0.84%
USDG.L L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF	4.56%	4.70%	3.99%	3.26%	2.24%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC81.L and USDG.L in my portfolio?

UC81.L and USDG.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UC81.L or USDG.L?

On fees, USDG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC81.L or USDG.L?

USDG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UC81.L.

What is the main difference between UC81.L and USDG.L?

UC81.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while USDG.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UC81.L and 0.09% for USDG.L.