UC81.L vs. UC63.L
UC81.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and UC63.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - UC81.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while UC63.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC81.L returned 3.31%/yr vs 8.91%/yr for UC63.L. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. UC81.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for UC63.L.
Performance
UC81.L vs. UC63.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC81.L achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than UC63.L's 5.83% return. Over the past 10 years, UC81.L has underperformed UC63.L with an annualized return of 3.31%, while UC63.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.91% annualized return.
UC81.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 2.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.20%
- 10Y*
- 3.31%
UC63.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 21.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
UC81.L vs. UC63.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC81.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.48% | -0.20% | 6.44% | 0.38% | 4.76% | 0.32% | 1.51% | 4.23% | 6.12% | -6.53% |
UC63.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis | 5.83% | 25.75% | 9.16% | 6.95% | 7.38% | 19.00% | -13.55% | 16.32% | -9.35% | 12.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC81.L and UC63.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2014 | -0.01 |
The correlation between UC81.L and UC63.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (5 years) to 0.00 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC81.L vs. UC63.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC81.L
UC63.L
UC81.L vs. UC63.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UC63.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UC81.L | UC63.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.36 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 2.39 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | 8.18 | -4.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UC81.L | UC63.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.93 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.95 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.59 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.48 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
UC81.L vs. UC63.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC81.L drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum UC63.L drawdown of -34.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC81.L and UC63.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC81.L | UC63.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.94% | -34.55% | +19.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.29% | -9.05% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.01% | -12.95% | +4.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.31% | -12.95% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.94% | -34.55% | +19.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -4.19% | +1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.56% | -4.76% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 2.65% | -0.98% |
Volatility
UC81.L vs. UC63.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L) is 1.51%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UC63.L) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that UC81.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC63.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC81.L | UC63.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 4.04% | -2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.27% | 9.72% | -5.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.82% | 11.19% | -5.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.78% | 12.88% | -5.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.16% | 15.11% | -5.95% |
UC81.L vs. UC63.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC81.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than UC63.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UC81.L vs. UC63.L - Dividend Comparison
UC81.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than UC63.L's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC63.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis | 2.87% | 2.73% | 3.12% | 3.69% | 3.71% | 3.22% | 3.86% | 4.21% | 3.55% | 4.46% | 2.14% | 4.44% |
UC81.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 4.67% | 5.59% | 4.77% | 3.28% | 1.36% | 1.58% | 2.75% | 2.90% | 2.20% | 2.16% | 1.86% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UC81.L and UC63.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UC81.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC81.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UC63.L.
UC81.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while UC63.L is Europe Equities. UC81.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while UC63.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UC81.L and 0.20% for UC63.L.
Find the right allocation for UC81.L and UC63.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer