UC67.L vs. FLQA.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

UC67.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and FLQA.L (Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - UC67.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while FLQA.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Linked FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China Index - Net Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC67.L returned 12.32%/yr vs 12.23%/yr for FLQA.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.14% expense ratio.

Performance

UC67.L vs. FLQA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC67.L) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLQA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC67.L achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than FLQA.L's 30.17% return.

UC67.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.83%
• 6M: 9.16%
• YTD: 10.26%
• 1Y: 20.85%
• 3Y*: 19.81%
• 5Y*: 12.32%
• 10Y*: 14.56%

FLQA.L

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -11.56%
• 6M: 22.63%
• YTD: 30.17%
• 1Y: 48.05%
• 3Y*: 24.43%
• 5Y*: 12.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC67.L vs. FLQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
UC67.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	10.26%	17.07%	24.74%	27.16%	-20.11%	27.17%	20.28%	30.31%	-14.09%
FLQA.L Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	30.17%	29.84%	7.76%	12.02%	-12.93%	4.57%	6.71%	9.75%	-5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between UC67.L and FLQA.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018	0.63

The correlation between UC67.L and FLQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UC67.L vs. FLQA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC67.L

UC67.L Risk / Return Rank: 74
UC67.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
UC67.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
UC67.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
UC67.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
UC67.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FLQA.L

FLQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
FLQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FLQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FLQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FLQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FLQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC67.L vs. FLQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC67.L) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UC67.L	FLQA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.90	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	2.49	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.34	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	3.37	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.36	10.76	-0.40

UC67.L vs. FLQA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC67.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the FLQA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC67.L and FLQA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UC67.L vs. FLQA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC67.L drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, which is greater than FLQA.L's maximum drawdown of -29.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC67.L and FLQA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC67.L	FLQA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.42%	-29.21%	-5.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.57%	-14.19%	+5.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.42%	-22.19%	+2.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.45%	-25.38%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-14.19%	+13.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.41%	-7.22%	+2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	4.45%	-2.33%

Volatility

UC67.L vs. FLQA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC67.L) is 2.99%, while Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLQA.L) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that UC67.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC67.L	FLQA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	10.89%	-7.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.35%	23.07%	-13.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.17%	25.18%	-13.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.37%	17.75%	-1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.49%	18.53%	-2.04%

UC67.L vs. FLQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UC67.L and FLQA.L have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UC67.L vs. FLQA.L - Dividend Comparison

UC67.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while FLQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLQA.L Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UC67.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	0.58%	0.62%	0.76%	0.89%	1.04%	0.75%	1.01%	1.14%	1.25%	0.58%	1.26%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC67.L and FLQA.L in my portfolio?

UC67.L and FLQA.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UC67.L or FLQA.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.14% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC67.L or FLQA.L?

UC67.L and FLQA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.14% per year.

What is the main difference between UC67.L and FLQA.L?

UC67.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLQA.L is Asia Pacific Equities. UC67.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FLQA.L tracks Linked FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China Index - Net Return. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Franklin.