PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC64.L vs. LDEG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC64.L vs. LDEG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-acc (UC64.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC64.L achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than LDEG.L's 10.41% return.


UC64.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
5.71%
6M
8.61%
1Y
21.48%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
8.92%

LDEG.L

1D
0.89%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
10.41%
6M
14.16%
1Y
30.16%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC64.L vs. LDEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UC64.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-acc
5.71%25.84%9.18%6.92%7.41%6.51%
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
10.41%44.92%8.83%14.32%3.42%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between UC64.L and LDEG.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021

0.60

The correlation between UC64.L and LDEG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.71 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UC64.L vs. LDEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UC64.L
LDEG.L

Financial Services

24.2%
41.5%

Consumer Defensive

14.7%
3.1%

Healthcare

14.3%
3.4%

Industrials

13.2%
15.8%

Energy

11.6%
7.7%

Basic Materials

9.3%
9.9%

Utilities

5.1%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
3.3%

Communication Services

2.5%
5.2%

Technology

0.6%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Financial Services

UC64.L
24.2%
LDEG.L
41.5%

Consumer Defensive

UC64.L
14.7%
LDEG.L
3.1%

Healthcare

UC64.L
14.3%
LDEG.L
3.4%

Industrials

UC64.L
13.2%
LDEG.L
15.8%

Energy

UC64.L
11.6%
LDEG.L
7.7%

Basic Materials

UC64.L
9.3%
LDEG.L
9.9%

Utilities

UC64.L
5.1%
LDEG.L
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

UC64.L
4.0%
LDEG.L
3.3%

Communication Services

UC64.L
2.5%
LDEG.L
5.2%

Technology

UC64.L
0.6%
LDEG.L
2.0%

Real Estate

UC64.L
0.6%
LDEG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC64.L vs. LDEG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC64.L
UC64.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UC64.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC64.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC64.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
UC64.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC64.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

LDEG.L
LDEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC64.L vs. LDEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-acc (UC64.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UC64.LLDEG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.48

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

3.78

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.12

13.82

-5.70

UC64.L vs. LDEG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC64.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC64.L and LDEG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UC64.LLDEG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.63

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

1.24

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

1.24

-0.75

Drawdowns

UC64.L vs. LDEG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC64.L drawdown since its inception was -34.57%, which is greater than LDEG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC64.L and LDEG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC64.LLDEG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.57%

-15.97%

-18.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-8.04%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.89%

-12.05%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.89%

-15.97%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.28%

-1.33%

-2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-2.95%

-1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.20%

+0.47%

Volatility

UC64.L vs. LDEG.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-acc (UC64.L) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) at 3.57%. This indicates that UC64.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC64.LLDEG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

3.57%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

9.21%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.13%

11.55%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.72%

15.99%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.07%

16.01%

-0.94%

UC64.L vs. LDEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC64.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LDEG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UC64.L vs. LDEG.L - Dividend Comparison

UC64.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
3.13%3.43%4.21%4.11%3.70%3.11%
UC64.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC64.L and LDEG.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC64.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC64.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEG.L.

UC64.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UC64.L and 0.25% for LDEG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC64.L and LDEG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer