UC64.L vs. LCPE.L
UC64.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-acc) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - UC64.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC64.L returned 8.92%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for LCPE.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UC64.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.
Performance
UC64.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC64.L achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, UC64.L has underperformed LCPE.L with an annualized return of 8.92%, while LCPE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.16% annualized return.
UC64.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- 5.71%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 21.48%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
LCPE.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 27.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
UC64.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC64.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-acc | 5.71% | 25.84% | 9.18% | 6.92% | 7.41% | 19.19% | -13.59% | 16.43% | -9.24% | 12.23% |
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 14.20% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 16.28% | 8.38% | 12.94% | -2.26% | 9.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC64.L and LCPE.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, UC64.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.
UC64.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UC64.L
LCPE.L
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
UC64.L
LCPE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
UC64.L
LCPE.L
Healthcare
UC64.L
LCPE.L
Industrials
UC64.L
LCPE.L
Energy
UC64.L
LCPE.L
Basic Materials
UC64.L
LCPE.L
Utilities
UC64.L
LCPE.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
UC64.L
LCPE.L
Communication Services
UC64.L
LCPE.L
Technology
UC64.L
LCPE.L
Real Estate
UC64.L
LCPE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC64.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC64.L
LCPE.L
UC64.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-acc (UC64.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UC64.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.43 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 4.13 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.12 | 13.66 | -5.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UC64.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.44 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 1.04 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 1.20 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.98 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
UC64.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC64.L drawdown since its inception was -34.57%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC64.L and LCPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC64.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.57% | -27.05% | -7.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -6.66% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.89% | -12.39% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.89% | -12.39% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.57% | -27.05% | -7.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.28% | -2.71% | -1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.78% | -3.52% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 2.02% | +0.65% |
Volatility
UC64.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-acc (UC64.L) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) at 3.81%. This indicates that UC64.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC64.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 3.81% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | 8.48% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.13% | 11.29% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 17.74% | -5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 20.60% | -5.53% |
UC64.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC64.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
UC64.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UC64.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UC64.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UC64.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC64.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.
UC64.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UC64.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Find the right allocation for UC64.L and LCPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer