PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC63.L vs. UBTL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC63.L vs. UBTL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UC63.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC63.L achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly higher than UBTL.L's -0.05% return.


UC63.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
5.83%
6M
8.68%
1Y
21.55%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
8.91%

UBTL.L

1D
0.19%
1M
1.43%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-0.86%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
-3.66%
5Y*
-4.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC63.L vs. UBTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UC63.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis
5.83%25.75%9.16%6.95%7.38%19.00%-13.55%16.32%-9.35%12.54%
UBTL.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
-0.05%-2.86%-3.20%-5.34%-24.00%9.31%19.40%13.92%0.17%-2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between UC63.L and UBTL.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2016

-0.01

The correlation between UC63.L and UBTL.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (5 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC63.L vs. UBTL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC63.L
UC63.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UC63.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC63.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC63.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
UC63.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC63.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

UBTL.L
UBTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UBTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
UBTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC63.L vs. UBTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UC63.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UC63.LUBTL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.10

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

0.64

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.18

1.25

+6.93

UC63.L vs. UBTL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC63.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the UBTL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC63.L and UBTL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UC63.LUBTL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

0.54

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

-0.29

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

-0.01

+0.49

Drawdowns

UC63.L vs. UBTL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC63.L drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, smaller than the maximum UBTL.L drawdown of -38.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC63.L and UBTL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC63.LUBTL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-38.66%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-7.89%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-16.09%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.95%

-38.66%

+25.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.19%

-34.41%

+30.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-16.79%

+12.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

4.09%

-1.44%

Volatility

UC63.L vs. UBTL.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UC63.L) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTL.L) at 2.36%. This indicates that UC63.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC63.LUBTL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

2.36%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

6.17%

+3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

9.40%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.88%

15.23%

-2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.11%

15.34%

-0.23%

UC63.L vs. UBTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UC63.L and UBTL.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UC63.L vs. UBTL.L - Dividend Comparison

UC63.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than UBTL.L's 6.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UBTL.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
6.15%5.34%5.57%6.49%8.27%2.56%0.73%2.60%2.29%1.99%0.00%0.00%
UC63.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis
2.87%2.73%3.12%3.69%3.71%3.22%3.86%4.21%3.55%4.46%2.14%4.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC63.L and UBTL.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC63.L and UBTL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

UC63.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while UBTL.L is Inflation-Protected Bonds. UC63.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while UBTL.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC63.L and UBTL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer