UC63.L vs. 5ESG.L
UC63.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis) and 5ESG.L (UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - UC63.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while 5ESG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UC63.L returned 12.25%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for 5ESG.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UC63.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for 5ESG.L.
Performance
UC63.L vs. 5ESG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC63.L achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly lower than 5ESG.L's 9.48% return.
UC63.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- 1Y
- 21.55%
- 3Y*
- 14.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
5ESG.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 29.78%
- 3Y*
- 21.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- —
UC63.L vs. 5ESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC63.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis | 5.83% | 25.75% | 9.16% | 6.95% | 7.38% | 19.00% | -13.55% | 7.01% |
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 9.48% | 18.26% | 23.62% | 26.17% | -20.24% | 31.59% | 15.77% | 14.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC63.L and 5ESG.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019 | 0.42 |
UC63.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UC63.L
5ESG.L
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
UC63.L
5ESG.L
Consumer Defensive
UC63.L
5ESG.L
Healthcare
UC63.L
5ESG.L
Industrials
UC63.L
5ESG.L
Energy
UC63.L
5ESG.L
Basic Materials
UC63.L
5ESG.L
Utilities
UC63.L
5ESG.L
Consumer Cyclical
UC63.L
5ESG.L
Communication Services
UC63.L
5ESG.L
Technology
UC63.L
5ESG.L
Real Estate
UC63.L
5ESG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC63.L vs. 5ESG.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC63.L
5ESG.L
UC63.L vs. 5ESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UC63.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UC63.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.48 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 3.33 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.18 | 14.65 | -6.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UC63.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.62 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.88 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.05 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
UC63.L vs. 5ESG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC63.L drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, which is greater than 5ESG.L's maximum drawdown of -31.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC63.L and 5ESG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC63.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.55% | -31.50% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -9.01% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.95% | -19.53% | +6.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.95% | -25.41% | +12.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.19% | -0.07% | -4.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.76% | -5.69% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 2.05% | +0.60% |
Volatility
UC63.L vs. 5ESG.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UC63.L) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) at 3.46%. This indicates that UC63.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 5ESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC63.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 3.46% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 8.51% | +1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.19% | 11.46% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.88% | 16.54% | -3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 19.13% | -4.02% |
UC63.L vs. 5ESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC63.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than 5ESG.L's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UC63.L vs. 5ESG.L - Dividend Comparison
UC63.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than 5ESG.L's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 0.62% | 0.87% | 0.47% | 1.07% | 1.32% | 0.89% | 1.25% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC63.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis | 2.87% | 2.73% | 3.12% | 3.69% | 3.71% | 3.22% | 3.86% | 4.21% | 3.55% | 4.46% | 2.14% | 4.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UC63.L and 5ESG.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 5ESG.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
5ESG.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UC63.L.
UC63.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while 5ESG.L is S&P 500. UC63.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UC63.L and 0.17% for 5ESG.L.
Find the right allocation for UC63.L and 5ESG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer