PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC55.L vs. WNRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC55.L vs. WNRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UC55.L is traded in GBp, while WNRG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WNRG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC55.L achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly lower than WNRG.L's 27.93% return. Over the past 10 years, UC55.L has outperformed WNRG.L with an annualized return of 12.53%, while WNRG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.


UC55.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.21%
6M
8.14%
YTD
10.37%
1Y
21.22%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
12.53%

WNRG.L

1D
1.10%
1M
3.20%
6M
21.06%
YTD
27.93%
1Y
37.02%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
21.10%
10Y*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC55.L vs. WNRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UC55.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
10.37%12.47%20.76%17.25%-8.62%23.36%11.95%22.81%-4.07%11.64%
WNRG.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
27.93%6.65%3.85%-1.65%64.04%40.05%-32.40%5.71%-9.95%-4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between UC55.L and WNRG.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2013

0.48

The correlation between UC55.L and WNRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC55.L vs. WNRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC55.L
UC55.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
UC55.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC55.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC55.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
UC55.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC55.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

WNRG.L
WNRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC55.L vs. WNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UC55.LWNRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

2.23

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.01

5.81

+7.20

UC55.L vs. WNRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC55.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC55.L and WNRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UC55.L vs. WNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC55.L drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, smaller than the maximum WNRG.L drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC55.L and WNRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC55.LWNRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.07%

-59.34%

+31.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-16.52%

+9.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

-21.66%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.92%

-22.11%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.07%

-59.34%

+31.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-10.03%

+9.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-12.66%

+9.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

6.35%

-4.63%

Volatility

UC55.L vs. WNRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC55.L) is 2.91%, while State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that UC55.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC55.LWNRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

6.42%

-3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

18.68%

-10.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

21.51%

-11.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.36%

23.88%

-10.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

33.22%

-18.47%

UC55.L vs. WNRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UC55.L and WNRG.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

UC55.L vs. WNRG.L - Dividend Comparison

UC55.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while WNRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UC55.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.89%1.02%1.09%1.30%1.38%1.01%1.28%1.66%1.66%1.70%1.72%1.86%
WNRG.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC55.L and WNRG.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC55.L and WNRG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

UC55.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while WNRG.L tracks MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC55.L and WNRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer