UC13.L vs. LSPU.L
UC13.L (UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis) and LSPU.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD) are both S&P 500 funds - UC13.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while LSPU.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC13.L returned 14.50%/yr vs 16.30%/yr for LSPU.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UC13.L charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for LSPU.L.
Performance
UC13.L vs. LSPU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UC13.L is traded in GBp, while LSPU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LSPU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC13.L achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly lower than LSPU.L's 10.83% return. Over the past 10 years, UC13.L has underperformed LSPU.L with an annualized return of 14.50%, while LSPU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.30% annualized return.
UC13.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 9.92%
- 6M
- 9.83%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.62%
- 10Y*
- 14.50%
LSPU.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 5.41%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 19.28%
- 5Y*
- 15.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.30%
UC13.L vs. LSPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC13.L UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis | 9.92% | 8.39% | 25.77% | 18.14% | -10.01% | 29.47% | 11.81% | 24.42% | -1.52% | 8.98% |
LSPU.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 10.83% | 9.13% | 27.74% | 20.59% | -8.85% | 30.77% | 14.51% | 25.79% | 0.33% | 11.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC13.L and LSPU.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013 | 0.92 |
The correlation between UC13.L and LSPU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
UC13.L vs. LSPU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UC13.L
LSPU.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
UC13.L
LSPU.L
Financial Services
UC13.L
LSPU.L
Communication Services
UC13.L
LSPU.L
Consumer Cyclical
UC13.L
LSPU.L
Healthcare
UC13.L
LSPU.L
Industrials
UC13.L
LSPU.L
Consumer Defensive
UC13.L
LSPU.L
Energy
UC13.L
LSPU.L
Utilities
UC13.L
LSPU.L
Real Estate
UC13.L
LSPU.L
Basic Materials
UC13.L
LSPU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC13.L vs. LSPU.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC13.L
LSPU.L
UC13.L vs. LSPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UC13.L | LSPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.45 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 4.06 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.58 | 13.83 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UC13.L | LSPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.45 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.98 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 0.98 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.89 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
UC13.L vs. LSPU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC13.L drawdown since its inception was -25.59%, roughly equal to the maximum LSPU.L drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC13.L and LSPU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC13.L | LSPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.59% | -26.08% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -7.16% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.52% | -21.15% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.52% | -21.15% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.59% | -26.08% | +0.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.22% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -3.46% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 2.11% | +0.10% |
Volatility
UC13.L vs. LSPU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) is 2.63%, while Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that UC13.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC13.L | LSPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 3.37% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.11% | 8.59% | -1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 11.84% | -1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 15.37% | -0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 16.52% | -0.80% |
UC13.L vs. LSPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC13.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than LSPU.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UC13.L vs. LSPU.L - Dividend Comparison
UC13.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than LSPU.L's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSPU.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 0.90% | 0.99% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 2.05% | 1.11% | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.96% | 1.68% | 1.96% | 2.01% |
UC13.L UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, UC13.L and LSPU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, UC13.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC13.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for LSPU.L.
UC13.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while LSPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for UC13.L and 0.09% for LSPU.L.
Find the right allocation for UC13.L and LSPU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer