PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC13.L vs. IESU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC13.L vs. IESU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC13.L achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than IESU.L's 28.61% return. Over the past 10 years, UC13.L has outperformed IESU.L with an annualized return of 14.47%, while IESU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.50% annualized return.


UC13.L

1D
-0.91%
1M
-0.79%
6M
7.58%
YTD
9.14%
1Y
19.77%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
14.47%

IESU.L

1D
1.07%
1M
4.80%
6M
20.56%
YTD
28.61%
1Y
35.99%
3Y*
13.44%
5Y*
22.82%
10Y*
8.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC13.L vs. IESU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis
9.14%9.50%27.24%19.64%-8.96%30.93%13.50%26.37%-0.07%10.75%
IESU.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
28.61%2.26%5.45%-5.96%83.53%53.82%-35.62%5.37%-13.39%-10.01%

Correlation

The correlation between UC13.L and IESU.L is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015

0.44

The correlation between UC13.L and IESU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC13.L vs. IESU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC13.L
UC13.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
UC13.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC13.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC13.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
UC13.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC13.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IESU.L
IESU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IESU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IESU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC13.L vs. IESU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UC13.LIESU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.26

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.07

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

5.01

+4.46

UC13.L vs. IESU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC13.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the IESU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC13.L and IESU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UC13.L vs. IESU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC13.L drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum IESU.L drawdown of -63.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC13.L and IESU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC13.LIESU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.33%

-63.88%

+24.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-17.34%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.11%

-26.36%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.11%

-26.36%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.59%

-62.16%

+36.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-10.65%

+8.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-20.50%

+13.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

7.16%

-5.08%

Volatility

UC13.L vs. IESU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) is 3.17%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that UC13.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC13.LIESU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

7.50%

-4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.88%

21.74%

-13.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.06%

24.54%

-13.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

29.08%

-14.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

29.16%

-13.61%

UC13.L vs. IESU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC13.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IESU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UC13.L vs. IESU.L - Dividend Comparison

UC13.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while IESU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IESU.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis
0.96%0.96%0.99%1.16%1.23%0.94%1.36%1.44%1.55%1.51%1.55%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC13.L and IESU.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC13.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC13.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IESU.L.

UC13.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IESU.L is Energy Equities. UC13.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IESU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for UC13.L and 0.15% for IESU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC13.L and IESU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer