PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UC13.L vs. 500U.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UC13.L vs. 500U.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UC13.L (UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis) and 500U.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both S&P 500 funds tracking the S&P 500 Index, from UBS and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC13.L returned 14.50%/yr vs 16.58%/yr for 500U.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UC13.L charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 500U.L.

Performance

UC13.L vs. 500U.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UC13.L is traded in GBp, while 500U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 500U.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC13.L achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly lower than 500U.L's 10.84% return. Over the past 10 years, UC13.L has underperformed 500U.L with an annualized return of 14.50%, while 500U.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.58% annualized return.

UC13.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
5.52%
YTD
9.92%
6M
9.83%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
14.50%

500U.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.46%
YTD
10.84%
6M
10.45%
1Y
29.20%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*
16.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC13.L vs. 500U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis		9.92%8.39%25.77%18.14%-10.01%29.47%11.81%24.42%-1.52%8.98%
500U.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc		10.86%9.90%26.63%20.51%-9.65%31.37%13.61%27.86%-0.37%11.56%

Correlation

The correlation between UC13.L and 500U.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013

0.65

Over the past year, UC13.L and 500U.L have become more correlated (0.91) than their long-term average of 0.65, meaning their price movements have been converging.

UC13.L vs. 500U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UC13.L
500U.L

Technology

37.9%
35.6%

Financial Services

11.3%
11.8%

Communication Services

10.9%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.5%

Industrials

7.8%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.9%

Energy

3.4%
3.5%

Utilities

2.2%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.8%

Technology

UC13.L
37.9%
500U.L
35.6%

Financial Services

UC13.L
11.3%
500U.L
11.8%

Communication Services

UC13.L
10.9%
500U.L
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

UC13.L
9.8%
500U.L
10.1%

Healthcare

UC13.L
8.3%
500U.L
8.5%

Industrials

UC13.L
7.8%
500U.L
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

UC13.L
4.8%
500U.L
4.9%

Energy

UC13.L
3.4%
500U.L
3.5%

Utilities

UC13.L
2.2%
500U.L
2.4%

Real Estate

UC13.L
1.9%
500U.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

UC13.L
1.7%
500U.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis

Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc

Often compared with UC13.L:
UC13.L vs. VUSA.LUC13.L vs. CSPX.LUC13.L vs. VOOUC13.L vs. SPXP.LUC13.L vs. SPYUC13.L vs. XDPG.LUC13.L vs. I500.L
Often compared with 500U.L:
500U.L vs. VOO500U.L vs. SPY500U.L vs. ALV.DE500U.L vs. 500P.L500U.L vs. 500D.L500U.L vs. GOOG500U.L vs. VSGX

Return for Risk

UC13.L vs. 500U.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UC13.L
UC13.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UC13.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC13.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC13.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UC13.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC13.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
500U.L
500U.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
500U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
500U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
500U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
500U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
500U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC13.L vs. 500U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UC13.L500U.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.65
2.45

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.55
3.33

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.45

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

4.04

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.58

13.57

-1.00

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC13.L vs. 500U.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC13.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the 500U.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC13.L and 500U.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UC13.L500U.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.45

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

1.00

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

1.17

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

1.33

-0.45

Drawdowns

UC13.L vs. 500U.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC13.L drawdown since its inception was -25.59%, roughly equal to the maximum 500U.L drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC13.L and 500U.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UC13.L500U.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.59%

-26.14%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-7.19%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.52%

-20.95%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.52%

-20.95%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.59%

-26.14%

+0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.22%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-3.62%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.15%

+0.06%

Volatility

UC13.L vs. 500U.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) is 2.63%, while Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that UC13.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 500U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UC13.L500U.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

3.59%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

8.66%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

11.86%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

15.26%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

18.56%

-2.84%

UC13.L vs. 500U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC13.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than 500U.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UC13.L vs. 500U.L - Dividend Comparison

UC13.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while 500U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
500U.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC13.L
UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis		0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.91, UC13.L and 500U.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, UC13.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC13.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 500U.L.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for UC13.L and 0.15% for 500U.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC13.L and 500U.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer