UC07.L vs. IESU.L
UC07.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and IESU.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - UC07.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while IESU.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC07.L returned 9.86%/yr vs 8.50%/yr for IESU.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UC07.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IESU.L.
Performance
UC07.L vs. IESU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC07.L achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly lower than IESU.L's 28.61% return. Over the past 10 years, UC07.L has outperformed IESU.L with an annualized return of 9.86%, while IESU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.50% annualized return.
UC07.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 1Y
- 18.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
IESU.L
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- 6M
- 20.56%
- YTD
- 28.61%
- 1Y
- 35.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.44%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 8.50%
UC07.L vs. IESU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC07.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 11.53% | 5.98% | 15.41% | 3.09% | 4.71% | 28.76% | -3.62% | 20.51% | -3.14% | 4.81% |
IESU.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 28.61% | 2.26% | 5.45% | -5.96% | 83.53% | 53.82% | -35.62% | 5.37% | -13.39% | -10.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC07.L and IESU.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UC07.L and IESU.L has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC07.L vs. IESU.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC07.L
IESU.L
UC07.L vs. IESU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC07.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UC07.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.26 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 2.07 | +1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.90 | 5.01 | +7.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UC07.L vs. IESU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC07.L drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, smaller than the maximum IESU.L drawdown of -63.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC07.L and IESU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC07.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.99% | -63.88% | +24.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.43% | -17.34% | +11.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.76% | -26.36% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.76% | -26.36% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.73% | -62.16% | +33.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -10.65% | +9.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | -20.50% | +13.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 7.16% | -5.69% |
Volatility
UC07.L vs. IESU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC07.L) is 2.25%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that UC07.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC07.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.25% | 7.50% | -5.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.25% | 21.74% | -15.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.76% | 24.54% | -15.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.50% | 29.08% | -16.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.67% | 29.16% | -14.49% |
UC07.L vs. IESU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC07.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IESU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UC07.L vs. IESU.L - Dividend Comparison
UC07.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while IESU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IESU.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC07.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.37% | 2.05% | 1.79% | 2.05% | 1.81% | 1.59% | 2.41% | 2.08% | 2.49% | 2.01% | 2.18% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UC07.L and IESU.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IESU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IESU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UC07.L.
UC07.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IESU.L is Energy Equities. UC07.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while IESU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UC07.L and 0.15% for IESU.L.
Find the right allocation for UC07.L and IESU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer