PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC07.L vs. FLXB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC07.L vs. FLXB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC07.L) and Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UC07.L is traded in GBp, while FLXB.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLXB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC07.L achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly lower than FLXB.L's 16.18% return.


UC07.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.66%
6M
7.96%
YTD
11.53%
1Y
18.99%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
9.86%

FLXB.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.27%
6M
10.87%
YTD
16.18%
1Y
37.00%
3Y*
10.17%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC07.L vs. FLXB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UC07.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
11.53%5.98%15.41%3.09%4.71%28.76%-3.62%10.25%
FLXB.L
Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
16.18%35.12%-26.66%26.76%24.12%-15.80%-21.79%7.45%

Correlation

The correlation between UC07.L and FLXB.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.35

The correlation between UC07.L and FLXB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC07.L vs. FLXB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC07.L
UC07.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
UC07.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC07.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC07.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UC07.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC07.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXB.L
FLXB.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FLXB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC07.L vs. FLXB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC07.L) and Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UC07.LFLXB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.28

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.27

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.90

5.81

+7.09

UC07.L vs. FLXB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC07.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the FLXB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC07.L and FLXB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UC07.L vs. FLXB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC07.L drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, smaller than the maximum FLXB.L drawdown of -53.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC07.L and FLXB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC07.LFLXB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.99%

-53.22%

+14.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.43%

-16.22%

+10.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.76%

-27.64%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.76%

-27.64%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-12.69%

+11.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-19.43%

+12.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

6.35%

-4.88%

Volatility

UC07.L vs. FLXB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC07.L) is 2.25%, while Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLXB.L) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that UC07.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC07.LFLXB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

5.35%

-3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.25%

16.97%

-10.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.76%

22.56%

-13.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.50%

26.27%

-13.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.67%

30.84%

-16.17%

UC07.L vs. FLXB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC07.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXB.L's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UC07.L vs. FLXB.L - Dividend Comparison

UC07.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while FLXB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLXB.L
Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC07.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.37%2.05%1.79%2.05%1.81%1.59%2.41%2.08%2.49%2.01%2.18%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


UC07.L and FLXB.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXB.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXB.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UC07.L.

UC07.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FLXB.L is Brazil Equities. UC07.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while FLXB.L tracks FTSE Brazil 30/18 Capped Index (Net Return). They also come from different issuers: UBS and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UC07.L and 0.19% for FLXB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC07.L and FLXB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer