UC04.L vs. UD08.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UC04.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and UD08.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UC04.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while UD08.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI Ex-Agriculture Ex-Livestock Capped (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UC04.L returned 28.68% vs 41.89% for UD08.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. UC04.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UD08.L.

Performance

UC04.L vs. UD08.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD08.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC04.L achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than UD08.L's 24.99% return.

UC04.L

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 4.68%
• YTD: 10.50%
• 6M: 9.68%
• 1Y: 28.68%
• 3Y*: 19.17%
• 5Y*: 14.74%
• 10Y*: 16.01%

UD08.L

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 24.99%
• 6M: 26.29%
• 1Y: 41.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC04.L vs. UD08.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UC04.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	10.50%	8.44%
UD08.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc	24.99%	14.80%

Correlation

The correlation between UC04.L and UD08.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025	-0.03

UC04.L vs. UD08.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UC04.L	UD08.L
Technology	37.7%	32.6%
Financial Services	11.2%	12.6%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	10.6%
Healthcare	8.5%	6.4%
Industrials	8.1%	14.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	3.9%
Energy	3.4%	2.9%
Utilities	2.1%	4.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.2%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.4%

Return for Risk

UC04.L vs. UD08.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC04.L

UC04.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
UC04.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
UC04.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
UC04.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
UC04.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
UC04.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

UD08.L

UD08.L Risk / Return Rank: 90
UD08.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
UD08.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
UD08.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
UD08.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
UD08.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC04.L vs. UD08.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD08.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UC04.L	UD08.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	3.05	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.61	3.87	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.57	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.74	6.65	-2.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.07	20.97	-7.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC04.L vs. UD08.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC04.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the UD08.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC04.L and UD08.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UC04.L	UD08.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	3.05	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	2.65	-1.67

Drawdowns

UC04.L vs. UD08.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC04.L drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, which is greater than UD08.L's maximum drawdown of -6.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC04.L and UD08.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC04.L	UD08.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.93%	-6.43%	-19.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.67%	-6.43%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-1.17%	+1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.46%	-1.41%	-2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	2.04%	+0.16%

Volatility

UC04.L vs. UD08.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD08.L) have volatilities of 2.72% and 2.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC04.L	UD08.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.72%	2.74%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.24%	11.75%	-4.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.63%	14.02%	-3.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.66%	14.96%	-0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.86%	14.96%	+0.90%

UC04.L vs. UD08.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC04.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than UD08.L's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

UC04.L vs. UD08.L - Dividend Comparison

UC04.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while UD08.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UC04.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	0.84%	0.96%	0.95%	1.12%	1.19%	0.89%	1.28%	1.40%	1.50%	1.32%	1.52%	1.44%
UD08.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC04.L and UD08.L in my portfolio?

UC04.L and UD08.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UC04.L or UD08.L?

On fees, UC04.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC04.L or UD08.L?

UC04.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UD08.L.

What is the main difference between UC04.L and UD08.L?

UC04.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UD08.L is Commodities. UC04.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while UD08.L tracks UBS CMCI Ex-Agriculture Ex-Livestock Capped (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.14% for UC04.L and 0.34% for UD08.L.