PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UC04.L vs. S5SD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UC04.L vs. S5SD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC04.L achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly higher than S5SD.L's 9.02% return.


UC04.L

1D
0.01%
1M
4.68%
YTD
10.50%
6M
9.68%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
16.01%

S5SD.L

1D
-0.44%
1M
3.54%
YTD
9.02%
6M
8.86%
1Y
29.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC04.L vs. S5SD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UC04.L and S5SD.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.95

The correlation between UC04.L and S5SD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

UC04.L vs. S5SD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UC04.L
S5SD.L

Technology

37.7%
38.6%

Financial Services

11.2%
12.0%

Communication Services

10.9%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
4.6%

Healthcare

8.5%
9.3%

Industrials

8.1%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
5.1%

Energy

3.4%
4.2%

Utilities

2.1%
0.8%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.9%

Technology

UC04.L
37.7%
S5SD.L
38.6%

Financial Services

UC04.L
11.2%
S5SD.L
12.0%

Communication Services

UC04.L
10.9%
S5SD.L
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UC04.L
9.9%
S5SD.L
4.6%

Healthcare

UC04.L
8.5%
S5SD.L
9.3%

Industrials

UC04.L
8.1%
S5SD.L
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

UC04.L
4.7%
S5SD.L
5.1%

Energy

UC04.L
3.4%
S5SD.L
4.2%

Utilities

UC04.L
2.1%
S5SD.L
0.8%

Real Estate

UC04.L
1.9%
S5SD.L
2.2%

Basic Materials

UC04.L
1.7%
S5SD.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UC04.L vs. S5SD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC04.L
UC04.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UC04.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC04.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC04.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UC04.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC04.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

S5SD.L
S5SD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
S5SD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S5SD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
S5SD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
S5SD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
S5SD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC04.L vs. S5SD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UC04.LS5SD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.54

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

4.13

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.07

15.94

-2.87

UC04.L vs. S5SD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC04.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the S5SD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC04.L and S5SD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UC04.LS5SD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.89

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

3.09

-2.11

Drawdowns

UC04.L vs. S5SD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC04.L drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, which is greater than S5SD.L's maximum drawdown of -7.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC04.L and S5SD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UC04.LS5SD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.93%

-7.32%

-18.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.67%

-7.32%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.44%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-1.26%

-2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

1.90%

+0.30%

Volatility

UC04.L vs. S5SD.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) have volatilities of 2.72% and 2.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UC04.LS5SD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

2.81%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

7.10%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

10.53%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

11.47%

+3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.86%

11.47%

+4.39%

UC04.L vs. S5SD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC04.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than S5SD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UC04.L vs. S5SD.L - Dividend Comparison

UC04.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while S5SD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
S5SD.L
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC04.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.84%0.96%0.95%1.12%1.19%0.89%1.28%1.40%1.50%1.32%1.52%1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, UC04.L and S5SD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, S5SD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

S5SD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for UC04.L.

UC04.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while S5SD.L is S&P 500. UC04.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while S5SD.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for UC04.L and 0.12% for S5SD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UC04.L and S5SD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer