UC04.L vs. EMRD.L
UC04.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and EMRD.L (State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - UC04.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while EMRD.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC04.L returned 14.70%/yr vs 8.87%/yr for EMRD.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UC04.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EMRD.L.
Performance
UC04.L vs. EMRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UC04.L is traded in GBp, while EMRD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMRD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC04.L achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly lower than EMRD.L's 19.61% return. Over the past 10 years, UC04.L has outperformed EMRD.L with an annualized return of 14.70%, while EMRD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.87% annualized return.
UC04.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.28%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
EMRD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.93%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- YTD
- 19.61%
- 1Y
- 36.05%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 8.87%
UC04.L vs. EMRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC04.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 10.60% | 9.28% | 27.38% | 20.50% | -10.51% | 28.96% | 16.61% | 26.56% | -0.32% | 10.74% |
EMRD.L State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 19.61% | 24.62% | 9.53% | 4.25% | -11.24% | -1.33% | 14.49% | 12.91% | -8.97% | 24.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between UC04.L and EMRD.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2012 | 0.55 |
The correlation between UC04.L and EMRD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UC04.L vs. EMRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC04.L
EMRD.L
UC04.L vs. EMRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UC04.L | EMRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 3.45 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 9.54 | -8.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UC04.L vs. EMRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC04.L drawdown since its inception was -39.47%, which is greater than EMRD.L's maximum drawdown of -31.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC04.L and EMRD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC04.L | EMRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.47% | -31.27% | -8.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.93% | -10.41% | -18.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.93% | -15.26% | -13.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.93% | -22.35% | -6.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.93% | -27.33% | -1.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.60% | -10.00% | -6.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.99% | -10.35% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.56% | 3.78% | +15.78% |
Volatility
UC04.L vs. EMRD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L) is 3.09%, while State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L) has a volatility of 9.01%. This indicates that UC04.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UC04.L | EMRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 9.01% | -5.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 18.72% | -10.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.54% | 20.85% | +22.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.94% | 17.68% | +6.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.58% | 19.03% | +1.55% |
UC04.L vs. EMRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC04.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than EMRD.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UC04.L vs. EMRD.L - Dividend Comparison
UC04.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while EMRD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMRD.L State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC04.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.85% | 0.96% | 0.95% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 0.89% | 1.28% | 1.40% | 1.50% | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UC04.L and EMRD.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UC04.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC04.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EMRD.L.
UC04.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EMRD.L is Emerging Markets Equities. UC04.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while EMRD.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for UC04.L and 0.18% for EMRD.L.
Find the right allocation for UC04.L and EMRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer