UBUS.DE vs. FGQD.L
UBUS.DE (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and FGQD.L (Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UBUS.DE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Prime Value, while FGQD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Global Quality Income index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UBUS.DE returned 8.96%/yr vs 11.72%/yr for FGQD.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UBUS.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FGQD.L.
Performance
UBUS.DE vs. FGQD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UBUS.DE is traded in EUR, while FGQD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FGQD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBUS.DE achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly lower than FGQD.L's 11.27% return.
UBUS.DE
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 8.30%
- 1Y
- 17.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.26%
FGQD.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 23.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
UBUS.DE vs. FGQD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBUS.DE UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 7.74% | 0.31% | 13.88% | 12.22% | -2.99% | 41.06% | -3.23% | 29.19% | -2.28% | 4.07% |
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF | 11.27% | 5.95% | 18.67% | 13.87% | -5.39% | 31.84% | 0.64% | 31.71% | -3.53% | 3.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBUS.DE and FGQD.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between UBUS.DE and FGQD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBUS.DE vs. FGQD.L — Risk / Return Rank
UBUS.DE
FGQD.L
UBUS.DE vs. FGQD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUS.DE) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBUS.DE | FGQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.44 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 3.60 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 15.69 | -6.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBUS.DE | FGQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.37 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.90 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.81 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
UBUS.DE vs. FGQD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBUS.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, roughly equal to the maximum FGQD.L drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBUS.DE and FGQD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBUS.DE | FGQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.63% | -33.91% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -6.51% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.86% | -19.10% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.86% | -19.10% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.15% | -3.91% | -1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.50% | +0.47% |
Volatility
UBUS.DE vs. FGQD.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUS.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) at 1.79%. This indicates that UBUS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGQD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBUS.DE | FGQD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 1.79% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.97% | 6.74% | +1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 9.90% | +1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 12.97% | +1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 15.49% | +0.88% |
UBUS.DE vs. FGQD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBUS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FGQD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBUS.DE vs. FGQD.L - Dividend Comparison
UBUS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than FGQD.L's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGQD.L Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF | 1.81% | 1.87% | 2.31% | 2.78% | 2.69% | 2.46% | 2.60% | 2.44% | 2.70% | 1.56% | 0.00% |
UBUS.DE UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.98% | 1.14% | 0.61% | 1.38% | 1.52% | 1.30% | 1.66% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.42% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBUS.DE and FGQD.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UBUS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UBUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQD.L.
UBUS.DE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FGQD.L is Global Equities. UBUS.DE tracks MSCI USA Prime Value, while FGQD.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UBUS.DE and 0.40% for FGQD.L.
Find the right allocation for UBUS.DE and FGQD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer