PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBTS.L vs. VUTY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBTS.L vs. VUTY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTS.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUTY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UBTS.L is traded in GBp, while VUTY.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUTY.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBTS.L achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly higher than VUTY.L's -0.16% return.


UBTS.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.80%
6M
0.83%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
2.02%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*

VUTY.L

1D
0.07%
1M
0.92%
YTD
-0.16%
6M
-0.74%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
0.23%
5Y*
0.61%
10Y*
1.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBTS.L vs. VUTY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBTS.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.80%-0.11%4.95%-1.59%3.39%6.97%4.62%3.52%5.25%-7.29%
VUTY.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
-0.16%-1.13%2.55%-1.94%-1.87%-1.11%3.99%3.70%6.64%-6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between UBTS.L and VUTY.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2016

0.90

The correlation between UBTS.L and VUTY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBTS.L vs. VUTY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBTS.L
UBTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
UBTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
UBTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VUTY.L
VUTY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VUTY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUTY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUTY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
VUTY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUTY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBTS.L vs. VUTY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTS.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUTY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBTS.LVUTY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.13

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

0.83

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.08

1.98

+1.09

UBTS.L vs. VUTY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBTS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the VUTY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBTS.L and VUTY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBTS.LVUTY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

0.73

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.07

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.13

+0.14

Drawdowns

UBTS.L vs. VUTY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBTS.L drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum VUTY.L drawdown of -22.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBTS.L and VUTY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBTS.LVUTY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.99%

-22.63%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

-5.25%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.52%

-8.27%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.99%

-16.17%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.74%

-17.85%

+12.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-12.63%

+5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

2.20%

-0.33%

Volatility

UBTS.L vs. VUTY.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTS.L) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUTY.L) at 1.43%. This indicates that UBTS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUTY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBTS.LVUTY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

1.43%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.63%

4.36%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.29%

5.96%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.15%

8.71%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.68%

10.00%

-1.32%

UBTS.L vs. VUTY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBTS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VUTY.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UBTS.L vs. VUTY.L - Dividend Comparison

UBTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than VUTY.L's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
UBTS.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
4.01%3.26%4.42%4.57%6.66%2.83%0.84%2.30%2.38%1.27%0.00%
VUTY.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
4.27%4.40%4.00%3.47%2.06%1.19%1.64%2.42%2.24%1.64%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBTS.L and VUTY.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUTY.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUTY.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UBTS.L.

UBTS.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while VUTY.L is Government Bonds. UBTS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while VUTY.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UBTS.L and 0.05% for VUTY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBTS.L and VUTY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer