UBTS.L vs. UC99.L
UBTS.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and UC99.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - UBTS.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while UC99.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UBTS.L returned 3.32%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for UC99.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UBTS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for UC99.L.
Performance
UBTS.L vs. UC99.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBTS.L achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than UC99.L's 10.42% return.
UBTS.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 5.77%
- 3Y*
- 2.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- —
UC99.L
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 6.73%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 10.82%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- 16.19%
UBTS.L vs. UC99.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBTS.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.80% | -0.11% | 4.95% | -1.59% | 3.39% | 6.97% | 4.62% | 3.52% | 5.25% | -7.29% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 10.42% | 8.68% | 22.60% | 27.58% | -15.03% | 28.64% | 16.43% | 32.55% | 0.49% | 12.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBTS.L and UC99.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2016 | 0.20 |
The correlation between UBTS.L and UC99.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (5 years) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBTS.L vs. UC99.L — Risk / Return Rank
UBTS.L
UC99.L
UBTS.L vs. UC99.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTS.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBTS.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.43 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 3.10 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.08 | 11.14 | -8.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBTS.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 2.41 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.87 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 1.00 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
UBTS.L vs. UC99.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBTS.L drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum UC99.L drawdown of -23.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBTS.L and UC99.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBTS.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.99% | -23.20% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -9.47% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.52% | -23.20% | +15.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.99% | -23.20% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.74% | 0.00% | -5.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.89% | -4.24% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 2.64% | -0.77% |
Volatility
UBTS.L vs. UC99.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTS.L) is 1.78%, while UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that UBTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC99.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBTS.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 3.33% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.63% | 8.62% | -3.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.29% | 12.19% | -5.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.15% | 16.02% | -7.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.68% | 16.54% | -7.86% |
UBTS.L vs. UC99.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBTS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UC99.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UBTS.L vs. UC99.L - Dividend Comparison
UBTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, while UC99.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBTS.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 4.01% | 3.26% | 4.42% | 4.57% | 6.66% | 2.83% | 0.84% | 2.30% | 2.38% | 1.27% | 0.00% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBTS.L and UC99.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UBTS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UBTS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC99.L.
UBTS.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while UC99.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. UBTS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while UC99.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UBTS.L and 0.25% for UC99.L.
Find the right allocation for UBTS.L and UC99.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer