UBTS.L vs. UC63.L
UBTS.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and UC63.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - UBTS.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while UC63.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UBTS.L returned 3.32%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for UC63.L. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. UBTS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for UC63.L.
Performance
UBTS.L vs. UC63.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBTS.L achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than UC63.L's 5.83% return.
UBTS.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 5.77%
- 3Y*
- 2.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- —
UC63.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 21.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
UBTS.L vs. UC63.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBTS.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.80% | -0.11% | 4.95% | -1.59% | 3.39% | 6.97% | 4.62% | 3.52% | 5.25% | -7.29% |
UC63.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis | 5.83% | 25.75% | 9.16% | 6.95% | 7.38% | 19.00% | -13.55% | 16.32% | -9.35% | 12.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBTS.L and UC63.L is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2016 | -0.01 |
The correlation between UBTS.L and UC63.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (5 years) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBTS.L vs. UC63.L — Risk / Return Rank
UBTS.L
UC63.L
UBTS.L vs. UC63.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTS.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UC63.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBTS.L | UC63.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.36 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 2.39 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.08 | 8.18 | -5.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBTS.L | UC63.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.93 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.95 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.48 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
UBTS.L vs. UC63.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBTS.L drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum UC63.L drawdown of -34.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBTS.L and UC63.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBTS.L | UC63.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.99% | -34.55% | +18.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -9.05% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.52% | -12.95% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.99% | -12.95% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.74% | -4.19% | -1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.89% | -4.76% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 2.65% | -0.78% |
Volatility
UBTS.L vs. UC63.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTS.L) is 1.78%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UC63.L) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that UBTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC63.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBTS.L | UC63.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 4.04% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.63% | 9.72% | -5.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.29% | 11.19% | -4.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.15% | 12.88% | -4.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.68% | 15.11% | -6.43% |
UBTS.L vs. UC63.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBTS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UC63.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UBTS.L vs. UC63.L - Dividend Comparison
UBTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than UC63.L's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBTS.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 4.01% | 3.26% | 4.42% | 4.57% | 6.66% | 2.83% | 0.84% | 2.30% | 2.38% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC63.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI UK UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis | 2.87% | 2.73% | 3.12% | 3.69% | 3.71% | 3.22% | 3.86% | 4.21% | 3.55% | 4.46% | 2.14% | 4.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBTS.L and UC63.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UBTS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UBTS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UC63.L.
UBTS.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while UC63.L is Europe Equities. UBTS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while UC63.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UBTS.L and 0.20% for UC63.L.
Find the right allocation for UBTS.L and UC63.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer