PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBTS.L vs. UB01.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBTS.L vs. UB01.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTS.L) and UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBTS.L achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than UB01.L's 6.40% return.


UBTS.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.80%
6M
0.83%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
2.02%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*

UB01.L

1D
0.60%
1M
4.75%
YTD
6.40%
6M
7.48%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
11.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBTS.L vs. UB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBTS.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.80%-0.11%4.95%-1.59%3.39%6.97%4.62%3.52%5.25%-7.29%
UB01.L
UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
6.40%28.34%6.43%19.85%-4.38%14.47%4.04%16.99%-6.90%18.45%

Correlation

The correlation between UBTS.L and UB01.L is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2016

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBTS.L vs. UB01.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBTS.L
UBTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
UBTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
UBTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

UB01.L
UB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
UB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
UB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBTS.L vs. UB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTS.L) and UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBTS.LUB01.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.27

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

2.05

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.08

6.42

-3.34

UBTS.L vs. UB01.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBTS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the UB01.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBTS.L and UB01.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBTS.LUB01.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.44

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

1.12

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

1.61

-1.34

Drawdowns

UBTS.L vs. UB01.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBTS.L drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum UB01.L drawdown of -29.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBTS.L and UB01.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBTS.LUB01.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.99%

-29.27%

+13.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

-11.38%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.52%

-13.55%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.99%

-21.12%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.74%

-0.60%

-5.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-4.20%

-2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

3.92%

-2.05%

Volatility

UBTS.L vs. UB01.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTS.L) is 1.78%, while UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that UBTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBTS.LUB01.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

4.80%

-3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.63%

12.76%

-8.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.29%

16.17%

-9.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.15%

26.79%

-18.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.68%

31.14%

-22.46%

UBTS.L vs. UB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UBTS.L and UB01.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UBTS.L vs. UB01.L - Dividend Comparison

UBTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than UB01.L's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UB01.L
UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.56%2.43%3.13%2.86%2.78%1.94%1.93%3.04%2.77%2.89%3.55%3.50%
UBTS.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 1-10 UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
4.01%3.26%4.42%4.57%6.66%2.83%0.84%2.30%2.38%1.27%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBTS.L and UB01.L have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UBTS.L and UB01.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

UBTS.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while UB01.L is Europe Equities. UBTS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while UB01.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBTS.L and UB01.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer