PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBTL.L vs. UC07.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBTL.L vs. UC07.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTL.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC07.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBTL.L achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than UC07.L's 10.79% return.


UBTL.L

1D
0.19%
1M
1.78%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-1.17%
1Y
5.11%
3Y*
-3.66%
5Y*
-4.40%
10Y*

UC07.L

1D
0.70%
1M
3.94%
YTD
10.79%
6M
11.16%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
13.53%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
11.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBTL.L vs. UC07.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBTL.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
-0.05%-2.86%-3.20%-5.34%-24.00%9.31%19.40%13.92%0.17%-2.13%
UC07.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
10.79%5.98%15.41%3.09%4.71%28.76%-3.62%20.51%-3.14%4.81%

Correlation

The correlation between UBTL.L and UC07.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2016

0.11

The correlation between UBTL.L and UC07.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBTL.L vs. UC07.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBTL.L
UBTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UBTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
UBTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

UC07.L
UC07.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
UC07.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC07.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC07.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
UC07.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC07.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBTL.L vs. UC07.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTL.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC07.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBTL.LUC07.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.48

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

4.38

-3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.25

16.39

-15.14

UBTL.L vs. UC07.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBTL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the UC07.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBTL.L and UC07.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBTL.LUC07.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

2.70

-2.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

0.83

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.76

-0.76

Drawdowns

UBTL.L vs. UC07.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBTL.L drawdown since its inception was -38.66%, which is greater than UC07.L's maximum drawdown of -28.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBTL.L and UC07.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBTL.LUC07.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.66%

-28.73%

-9.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-5.43%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-16.76%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.66%

-16.76%

-21.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.41%

0.00%

-34.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.79%

-3.95%

-12.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

1.45%

+2.64%

Volatility

UBTL.L vs. UC07.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTL.L) has a higher volatility of 2.36% compared to UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC07.L) at 2.20%. This indicates that UBTL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC07.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBTL.LUC07.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

2.20%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.17%

6.17%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.40%

8.80%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.23%

12.52%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.34%

14.84%

+0.50%

UBTL.L vs. UC07.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UBTL.L and UC07.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UBTL.L vs. UC07.L - Dividend Comparison

UBTL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, more than UC07.L's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UBTL.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
6.15%5.34%5.57%6.49%8.27%2.56%0.73%2.60%2.29%1.99%0.00%0.00%
UC07.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.38%2.05%1.79%2.04%1.81%1.59%2.41%2.08%2.49%2.01%2.18%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBTL.L and UC07.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UBTL.L and UC07.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

UBTL.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while UC07.L is Large Cap Value Equities. UBTL.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while UC07.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBTL.L and UC07.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer