UBTL.L vs. UC04.L
UBTL.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and UC04.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - UBTL.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while UC04.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UBTL.L returned -4.40%/yr vs 14.74%/yr for UC04.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UBTL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for UC04.L.
Performance
UBTL.L vs. UC04.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBTL.L achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than UC04.L's 10.50% return.
UBTL.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- -1.17%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- -3.66%
- 5Y*
- -4.40%
- 10Y*
- —
UC04.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 10.50%
- 6M
- 10.32%
- 1Y
- 28.86%
- 3Y*
- 19.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- 16.01%
UBTL.L vs. UC04.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBTL.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | -0.05% | -2.86% | -3.20% | -5.34% | -24.00% | 9.31% | 19.40% | 13.92% | 0.17% | -2.13% |
UC04.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 10.50% | 9.28% | 27.38% | 20.52% | -10.51% | 28.96% | 16.61% | 26.56% | -0.32% | 10.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBTL.L and UC04.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2016 | 0.11 |
The correlation between UBTL.L and UC04.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (5 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBTL.L vs. UC04.L — Risk / Return Rank
UBTL.L
UC04.L
UBTL.L vs. UC04.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTL.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBTL.L | UC04.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.50 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 3.74 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.25 | 13.07 | -11.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBTL.L | UC04.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 2.70 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 1.01 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.98 | -0.98 |
Drawdowns
UBTL.L vs. UC04.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBTL.L drawdown since its inception was -38.66%, which is greater than UC04.L's maximum drawdown of -25.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBTL.L and UC04.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBTL.L | UC04.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.66% | -25.93% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -7.67% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.30% | -21.14% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.66% | -21.14% | -17.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.41% | -0.17% | -34.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.79% | -3.46% | -13.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 2.20% | +1.89% |
Volatility
UBTL.L vs. UC04.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTL.L) is 2.36%, while UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that UBTL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC04.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBTL.L | UC04.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 2.72% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 7.24% | -1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.40% | 10.63% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 14.66% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 15.86% | -0.52% |
UBTL.L vs. UC04.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBTL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than UC04.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UBTL.L vs. UC04.L - Dividend Comparison
UBTL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, more than UC04.L's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBTL.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 6.15% | 5.34% | 5.57% | 6.49% | 8.27% | 2.56% | 0.73% | 2.60% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC04.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.84% | 0.96% | 0.95% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 0.89% | 1.28% | 1.40% | 1.50% | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBTL.L and UC04.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UC04.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC04.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UBTL.L.
UBTL.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while UC04.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. UBTL.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while UC04.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UBTL.L and 0.14% for UC04.L.
Find the right allocation for UBTL.L and UC04.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer